Sherry Peel Jackson Ex IRS Agent on Income Tax (2of2)

Sherry Peel Jackson Certified Fraud Examiner Ex IRS Agent on Income Tax


Sherry Peel Jackson - Breaking The Invisible Shackles Of The IRS
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1658315558785013776

http://ronpaul2008.com

http://www.freedomvideo.org/blog/?p=521

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Sherry
• Peel
• Jackson
• Ex
• IRS
• Agent
• on
• Income
• Tax
• Federal
• Reserve
• System
• Banking
• Cartel
• NWO

[jpdaddygid]

In a tax trial the judge instructs the jury, that they must find guilty if they didn't pay the tax period. you do not receive a fair impartial hearing. They will not debate anything except whether you owe taxes. If you owe 1 dollar and are on trial you are guilty of tax evasion or fraud!!!

[RetSquid]

@jpdaddygid

You don't get to argue the law in a jury trial, only the facts of the case. The law itself can be argued in an appeal.

[RetSquid]

@PrisonPlanetSector9

What do you have against people who post the Truth? Maybe I am here because I think liars, like yourself, need to be exposed?

[PrisonPlanetSector9]

It is truly fascinating to hear a person such as this retsquid argue in favor of maintaining his slavemasters in the style to which they have long become accustomed. He is either a paid shill or directly makes his living from stealing money from people via taxes. Either way, may he be one of the first stood against the bullet-ridden wall when everything finally comes to a head and we free beings take back our rights.  You, retsquid, are a vile traitor to any notion of liberty.

[RetSquid]

@chrishufstetler

What are you claiming to trade in this scheme of yours? Anything you received in trade or compensation for your labor is also defined as income under Title 26.

[chrishufstetler]

Conducting *

[chrishufstetler]

@Retsquid In the Connor vs case. He argued over wages. I am not arguing over wages. Wages are defined in the code as a gain. This case is irrelevant to me and most Americans that don't Gain a darn thing while conduction fair trade.

[chrishufstetler]

@Retsquid Again you have again confirmed that Income is a "gain" And does not apply to most Americans. Only to those that Gain something. :-)

[RetSquid]

@chrishufstetler

“The taxpayer next argues that wages are not income but an exchange of property. As money is property and labor is property, so his argument goes, his work for wages is a non-taxable exchange of property. Wrong again. Wages are income...The argument that they are not has been rejected so frequently that the very raising of it justifies the imposition of sanctions.”

Connor v. Commissioner

[RetSquid]

@chrishufstetler

“Plaintiff argues he is entitled to relief because the Code does not define income. The United States, however, is correct that “income” is afforded its every day usage as any gain derived from capital, labor, or both combined. See United States v. Richards, 723 F.2d 646, 648 (6th Cir. 1983). In addition, the Code explicitly defines “gross income”, from which taxable income is computed, as including compensation for services, i.e., wages.”

Tornichio v. United States,

[chrishufstetler]

@Retsquid So where's your evidence that proves the average man or woman has"Gains"? Hmm?

[chrishufstetler]

@Retsquid Objection. No where in any amendment is "Income" defined.

Furthermore you just again proved my point that income is indeed profits and gains. Only a fool would would equally trade and then voluntarily say it's all gains. Haha!! Ignorance in America!