Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

【DEMO:CC】ROLAND JUNO-106

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
57,130
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
There is no Interactive Transcript.

Uploaded by on Nov 6, 2008

Please request any products you want http://musictrack.jp/request/
DEMO by Katsunori UJIIE

往年の国産アナログシンセ【JUNO-106】
そのサウンドに迫る!

ミュージックトラック オフィシャルレビュー

国産のコンシューマ向け、ポリフォニックシンセサイザーJUNO-106。
いまだに人気のその秘密を探ります。

レビューの詳細なレポート、高音質バージョンはMusicTrackのオフィシャルレ ビューで公開中です。

Category:

Music

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Roland Corp - for the love of God.....you have many classic products where the R&D has already been done....please reissue the Juno, Jupiter and TR's.

  • juno 6/60 and juno 106 are REAL JUNO SERIES NOT THE JUNO D , JUNO STAGE, JUNO G and other

see all

All Comments (56)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • They don't make em like they used to.

  • @markix88 They won't reissue, because it would cost more to produce Juno with analog VCF then to produce Jupiter-80. Analog components are very expensive these days. You have a monophonic Moog for $3000+, can you imagine what a six voice analog synth would cost? I would still go on eBay and search for a real Juno from 1984.

  • **ERROR** Ujiie, I think there's an error in your review: DCO doesn't mean oscillators are digital...but that oscillators are digitally controlled:"These are an interesting hybrid design. Although digitally controlled are digitally stable, the oscillator produces a true analogue output, even for ramp waves".

  • I have a 106 and there is some serious magic in the simplicity of the of this machine. I consider selling it about once a month. Every time I decide to advertise it I give it a little playing time, three hours later I always change my mind.

  • Ok - but for a classic analogue synth there is the lack of a second oscillator. So if you want to make the sound fat you got to use the built in chorus unit. But thar chorus is way too noisy - like all Roland chorus units of that time. So if someone is going for this synth he should buy a better TC chorus.

  • jupiter 4, 6 and 8 are REAL JUPITER SERIES NOT THE JUPITER 80

  • I wanna win the lottery and buy all my lust after classic 70s-90s synths and spend my days tinkering.... mmmmmmmmmm

  • I owned a Juno 106 back in the 80s. It was a fun synth, but with only a single DCO, it was somewhat limited in the richness you could deliver. Of course, it beat the pants off hte crop of digital synths that were emerging, but even today, I find the 106 to sound thinner than many of the other roland synths from the time. The chorus helps a bit, but tends to make the sound swim. The best thing about the synth was that it was really hands-on, but the sound is a bit lacking.

  • I love the Juno Series, more the classic until the Juno-D... simply JUNOMANIA!!!

  • I got the chills. I must hunt down a Juno-6, NAO!!!!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more