Do You Really Need 21-Megapixels?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
27,941
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 29, 2008

World renowned photographer, George Lepp, was giving a Canon EOS 5D Mark II presentation at the Canon Booth during PhotoPlus Expo and demonstrated some of the advantages of shooting with 21-megapixels.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (41)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i found a 50 dollar 21 megapixel camera

  • 1.8 MP ftw

  • a 21 megapixel camera even with the best lense will never beat the old no longer manufactured 110 never never never .

  • Is 12megapixel enought for 24X36inch poster size prints?

  • @bellci absolutely right .. thumbs up 

  • dude people have 1700 megapixel cameras lol.

  • @ranjoeri the lens is responsible for zoom. the megamixels is the sensor which is actually part of the camera. you can buy a huge lens just for zooming far.

  • D3s for ever

  • @olddeuteronomy a 16 magapixel 1ds mark II is better than say an 18 magapixel 7d because the 1ds is full frame, which means cleaner pixels.... right? im not a pro at this and i dont even own a dslr right now but thats what ive heard ahaha

  • 21 mp is especially useful if you're doing photojournalism, nature shots, sports, etc. If you're just doing portraits or family pictures, you don't need to crop so extensively.

    Canon's new rebel has 18 mp for under $1000, that's good enough for me.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more