4 atheist fallacies?

You're the one with the error in logic here.

(Yeah, no webcam.)

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• atheist
• fallacies

[ptica11]

Day 1: creation of light and its separation from darkness. Day 2: separation of the sky and oceans. Day 3: separation of land from the oceans; spreading of plants and grass and trees across the land. Day 4: Creation of the sun, moon, and stars. Day 5: Creation of sea animals and birds. Day 6: Creation of the land animals. Creation of humanity, "someone like ourselves" (Living Bible). Day 7: God rested.

Of course this is what big bang theory is based on wow i am so impressed

[BlasphemyBaby]

Your channel comments indicate you're not a theist... and yet...?

Just in case you're not being sarcastic, Big Bang theory is based on microwave background radiation, redshifting stars, common elements, dating techniques... and more.

Channels like DonExodus (a Christian), ProfMTH, Extantdodo, Potholer54, and other educational channels are much better at describing it. Check them out if you get the chance.

[HIIMYOUTOOB]

I can keep going on, but you either gonna get it or not at about this point, so just tell me IF you do want me to go on, but I would suppose by now its either burnt out, or you get it.

[BlasphemyBaby]

Nope.

The problem with "science" in the Bible is that they never find the "science" stuff until after SCIENCE has discovered it... meanings it's all just interpretation.

And "then it would be too easy?" Are you kidding? "You don't pull random interpretations out of your butt, so you get to SPEND ETERNITY IN HELL." Uh-huh. Real loving deity you got there, bud.

Please, check out ProfMTH, DonExodus(a Christian), Potholer54, and ExtantDodo, and get educated. THEN, come comment here again.

[RealityBend]

using the bible to prove the bible is a base assertion fallacy,

[VenomOXP]

@skud9999 with all due respect, that is a big load of bullshit. "Proof" is not merely an interpretation. You fail to realize that the onus of proof... the BURDEN on proof, lies with the person who claims to know. In other words, atheists claim not to know. theists claim they do know. Therefore, the burden of proof defers to the religious. They have no proof, and thus by the rules of logic [and occam's razor] we do not make assumptions without sufficient evidence. Only MAGIC can do that ;)

[ammoMtaFoY]

@mjklable Let's say that I wrote a book saying that leprechauns exist. Then, when you ask why I make those assertions, let's say I cite that book as evidence. That would be a logical fallacy on my part. The same applies for the Bible. Saying that "The Bible is right because the Bible says so" is an error in logic.

[mjklable]

@ammoMtaFoY why is it not possible? Please explain because i`d like to understand that.

[WhatSayestThou]

Athieism is a religion unto itself. And that's all I got to say about that.

[australianresistance]

The thing is Theologians don't use the Bible to prove the Bible. They find out why the Bible is reliable and then use it. nomsayin

[live4bass]

i use star wars to prove you have microbiological cells that can control objects and create lighting in you :P if that's not completely retarded to you might need to take a formal logic course... circular logic isn't logic that's why it's circular... it does not prove itself nor does it say anything about the real world using the bible to prove the bible is just such logic.

[blazearmoru]

MAKE MOREEE

[blazearmoru]

haha

[chrisinsocalif]

Another dumb act creationists make is saying "Disprove the existence of god!" IF you say that as a part of your argument, you are stupid. You cannot Disprove something that doesn't have proof to disprove, hence the term. Get it?