31,000 "scientists" disagree with climate change? You mean family doctors and veterinarians?

The supposed 31,000 "scientists" that signed the Petition Project against global warming are actually not climatologists, geologists, meteorologists, and most aren't even legitimate scientists.

See the list yourself here
http://www.oism.org/pproject/s33p333.htm
and Google random names. Most either just bounce back to the list or reveal that these are just doctors, nurses, veterinarians, professors in unrelated fields, and various other professionals with no background in climate science whatsoever.

Climate deniers number one argument, debunked. Very easily.

Also Google pretty much any organization or publication that denies global warming can be traced back to big business or conservative ties.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• dave
• odd
• climategate
• climate
• change
• scientists
• 31
• 000
• global
• science
• debunk
• climatology
• climatologists
• warming
• deniers
• al
• gore
• myth
• busted

[DaveOdd]

Google ANY of the names on that list yourself, at random, and you will find that literally 95% of them have no education or degrees related to the field of climate change. I came across one Geologist while doing random searches and found out that he worked for Amoco for 20 years. I'm not making it up, search names on the list yourself, I guarantee it will take you a very long time to find anyone on that list who can even be considered a "top scientist".

[DaveOdd]

Google ANY of the names on that list yourself, at random, and you will find that literally 95% of them have no education or degrees related to the field of climate change. I came across one Geologist while doing random searches and found out that he worked for Amoco for 20 years. I'm not making it up, search names on the list yourself, I guarantee it will take you a very long time to find anyone on that list who can even be considered a "top scientist".

[DaveOdd]

Notice that the negative responses are nearly incomprehensible.

This has been the deniers number 1 go to for disproving man made global warming, 31,000 "scientists" that disagree, barely any of which are well versed in the field of climatology. It's a bullshit list.

It should also be noted this was signed in 1998, and started by a tobacco company doctor that used to lobby that cigarettes were no health risk and now works for big oil.

[GodzillaMonstaMan]

Most of the 2,500 'scientists' that supposedly form the mass concensus are not scientists! 1,000 years ago it was warmer than it is now, but no fossil fuels then was there? Work it out for yourself, it's not difficult to do.

[bishopruger]

@DaveOdd Look Natural Climate Change does exist & has since the forming of the earths atmosphere but manmade warming that is being taught & preached is false and serves as yet another method of control for those knowing the lie against those who simply accept it. Questioning "authorities" and debate should be welcomed instead its made fun of. You seem like a intelligent person so dont just go along with the hype and trust everything you're told by those in authority.

[bishopruger]

@ DaveOdd and a lead author for the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, produced evidence predicting two decades of natural global cooling caused by cyclical changes in the atmosphere and ocean currents in the North Atlantic, known as the North Atlantic Oscillation and the Atlantic Meridional Oscillation.

[bishopruger]

@DaveOdd creditable source #1-Data from the U.S. National Climate Data Center indicate temps in the U.S. have cooled over the last decade at a rate that projects to a decline of 7.3 degrees F over the next century. CS#2 Satellite data recorded at the University of Alabama in Huntsville show a global-cooling pattern over the last decade. CS#3 Mojib Latif, a climate physicist at the Liebniz Institute of Marine Sciences at the University of Kiel in Germany and a lead -- CONTINED

[bishopruger]

There are more and more well known top scientists coming out with doubts about man-made global warming, take John Christy for example, Nobel Prize winner. He basically states we can barely predict the weather 3 days from now never mind years down the road. Frankly one only needs to look at the proposed ways to handle the problem, cap n trade, carbon taxes, smart meters. All revenue generating and actually hurt the general public.When you look behind the Green movement in general its big business

[mphello]

Love those idiot one-word soundbite conspiracy believers, throwing words around like HAARP and chemtrails with ZERO thought about what they are, what they really mean, and pretending that it has ANYTHING to do with disproving anthropogenic global warming (AGW).

[mphello]

Great video, DaveOdd! Keep it up!

Fossil fuels companies get seven times as much subisidies as renewables.

We need tough laws to punish this kind of outrageous behavior by coal CEOs and politicians, and give NO subsidies to fossil fuels.

[xXJADEXx7]

an economist is at the head of the ICCP scientists, only 20% of the ICCP are climate change scientists.

[MichaelJShepherd]

@MichaelJShepherd (cont) that will destroy the greatest nation on Earth. Lemming.

[MichaelJShepherd]

Your a goof. I think the point here is that Scientists still have the ability to make more logical votes on this topic even if they are not Weather Scientists. Additionally, it just supports the point how easy it is to get any group of scientists to vote in a direction like the so called Scientists that claim Global Warming will take us all out and for us to run for the hills. Do us a favor and tell our govtt to stop playing with HAARP and chem-trails and pretending that its our automobiles