Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Richard Dawkins on the Orielly Factor

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
7,629
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 27, 2007

Richard Dawkins on the Orielly Factor.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Ha! As a battle of intellects, this is equivalent to putting Mike Tyson in a boxing ring to fight Helen Keller. O'Reilly is a moron.

  • Wow, Bill O´rielly sure is dumb.

see all

All Comments (125)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • If bill let richard talk, rich would have stomped his ass down the shower drain.

  • the enture time bill was talking out of his ass, when are christians going to STOP using the Bible as a factual historical reference???

  • A huge number of organizations have employees that surf the web and look at porn on company time. So what? Whats that to do with the qualifications of top scientists who make decisions addressing the technical issues of string theory? You may as well say GE is incompetent building jet engines because some of it's employees look at porn on the web. Do you still think your knowlege regarding ST is superior to those scientists ? Look up Edward Witten on Wiki along with some of the subject matter.

  • I disagree, it has enormous implications on the validity of funded projects when those in decision making positions as NSF are caught spending up to 40 % of their days at NSF watching porn on their work computers over the period of years. And my statement still stands, string theory is no more or less capable of being proven than the existence of god, yet you refute god as a scientific possibility and defend string theory.

  • So, you follow sensational and splashy news stories? And that is your basis for thinking you have superior knowlege to the NSF scientists about string theory ? Do your realize the porn scandal (I'm not familiar with it) has absolutely nothing to do with qualifications regarding understanding of string theory. So you are more qualified than, say, Edward Witten ? I'm surprised you would make such a claim.

  • Would this be the same NSF that got busted about 4 months ago in a massive porn scam.... soooo I am saying, yes I do

  • So you understand the issues better than the NSF?

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more