Saxo VTS 0-160 km/h
Uploader Comments (GrandDanois)
Top Comments
-
little rocket luv em
All Comments (51)
-
@mrdia1995 plus bmw has no handling if you dont how to drive a rwd car....And it's just not as reliable as you think...
-
@mrdia1995 bmw is the worse choice when it comes to money and efficiency..You will buy a 316 E92 bmw
for 40.000 thousand euros in 1.6l you have an engine that produces 122hp...You can buy a saxo for about 7.000 euros max with 50.000 kilometers.When it comes to handling saxo is one of the best cars at its category so think now what is more profitable ? To spend a fortune getting an 1.6l engine with 122 hp it's just nonsense man....
-
@mrdia1995 A statement like that means you know shit about cars.
-
@mrdia1995 my 1.6i engine from psa is more than 400k km and work perfectly... and its a 1999 version =)
-
@mrdia1995 i have to disagree My mom had 106 gti for 9 years. 1 owner, Normal dealer stamps and work carryed out (oil,spark plugs cambelt) never failed a mot with over 148k
-
My saxo vtr has 198.000... still driving like new :)
never 118hp
Corsau14NZ 2 weeks ago
@Corsau14NZ - i agree, Citroen has been stingy with the power specs. I've seen stock Saxo VTS put out 135 HP+ on a dyno.
GrandDanois 2 weeks ago
I know perfectly this "big little car" and seeing this chrono, I can say perfectly also that your car is not only tuned on airbox and exhaust, the engine or/and the weight is very tuned also
You dont say to us all the things about your VTS...
cumbas 6 months ago
@cumbas - i'm telling you everything i know. Complete exhaust and cold air intake air system. But yes, the weight was tuned a bit, i didn't have my subwoofer in the car in this video.
GrandDanois 6 months ago
mrdia1995, welcome to my blocked user list! I'm so tired of your thin argumentation.
GrandDanois 2 years ago 6