Quantum Physics vs Naive Realism (Part 1)

Themanofearth made a video response to us titled, "Assertions In The Driveway." This is our response to that video.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• themanofearth
• boy
• atheist
• atheism
• atheistic
• theist
• theism
• theistic
• god
• jesus
• double
• slit
• experiment
• realism
• realist
• materialism
• materialist
• naturalism
• naturalist
• observer
• wave
• function
• collapse
• delayed
• choice
• quantum
• eraser
• physics
• mechanics
• perception
• religion
• religious

[Bill123etc]

I just had a blinding arument with my girlfriend about this....shes such a concrete dumbass but always seems to get her moronic point of view across better than me!...thanks for the video...totally bitch slapped her with it....no sex for week but was worth it

[theprodigy2186]

@Bill123etc hahaha, you're welcome bro, glad we could help

[Wrath0fKhan]

Oh.... Now I get it... You are trying to disprove "naive realism" by applying naive realism. Thats funny! You know you cant do that, since all that remains, all that your brain was able to derive was just another "round" of naive realism! lol

[Wrath0fKhan]

5a. Qualified yes. (Our senses gather the inputs and path them on - brain creates our "perception bubble.") 5b. Qualified yes. (Even if we mostly make mistakes, our "perception bubble" seems to work sufficiently enough to allow us to get by as individuals and as species. Sometimes it works even so well that we can "invent" some funky stuff like math/logic, science, technology and we even can pass it all on to other generations.)

[Wrath0fKhan]

1. Yes. (See my beautiful baseball bat.) 2. Yes. (Oh, for sure, you already suspect what likely is to follow.) 3. Yes. (Wanna bet against my baseball bat? You dont have to keep watching/perceiving. You even can heavily alter your perception with drugs.) 4. Yes. (If the car was "blue", it will most likely "stay blue" for a couple of years - no matter how many times you will "measure." Even if you turn colorblind , you still will be able to measure the "blue" wavelengths.)

[maxavail]

Secondly, there's no proof that a particle is inexistent while moving on a wave front of probabilities and becomes existent only when observed. An alternative explanation is that it just changes the way it moves once observed (e.g. from moving on a wave front to moving in a straight line).

[maxavail]

It's wrong to say things stop having the same observable physical properties once you take your eyes off them, because what causes in fact the collapse of a wave function is not whether or not you're looking at an electron but rather whether or not you can look at it. So, as long as I can know an object, it's gonna retain its properties, even when I take my eyes off it.

[14sJakeB190]

Woahhhh....... If this is correct.... Realism, Materialism, and ultimately Atheism/Nihilism completely fall apart!!!!

I really hope it is.

I'm gonna like and favorite this vid.

[14sJakeB190]

@JohananRaatz Have you ever noticed something.

When we're dreaming... When we see people, we think that they're them, and I'm me. But they're in your dream so they're you. Meaning what if we're a part of someones dream? Maybe that someone is called God?