The Big Bang mentioned in the Qur'an 1400 years ago !

in the field of 'Astronomy', the Scientists, the Astronomers, a few decades earlier, they described, how the universe came into existence - They call it the 'Big Bang'. And they said... 'Initially there was one primary nebula, which later on it separated with a Big Bang, which gave rise to Galaxies, Stars, Sun and the Earth, we live in.' This information is given in a nutshell in the Glorious Qur'an, in Surah Ambiya, Ch. 21, Verse No. 30, which says.... أَوَلَمْ يَرَى الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا.... Do not the unbelievers see...? .... أَنَّ السَّمَوَاتِ وَالأَرْضَ كَانَتَا رَتْقاً فَفَتَقْنَاهُمَا .... 'That the heavens and the earth were joined together, and we clove them asunder.' Imagine this information which we came to know recently, the Qur'an mentions 14 hundred years ago.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• islam
• zakir
• naik
• science

[efraimgarner]

Odd feedback for this video yet again.

[myorangegarden]

I am fed up with this "it was always in quran." thing. if a squid with 11 heads is discovered now I am sure someone will say quran mentioned it and find some vague verse to prove it.

[quezcatol]

so to explain big bang you would write:

"Do not the unbelievers see...? .... أَنَّ السَّمَوَاتِ وَالأَرْضَ كَانَتَا رَتْقاً فَفَتَقْنَاهُمَا .... 'That the heavens and the earth were joined together, and we clove them asunder."

what a horrible way to explain big bang theory.

[77GSlinger]

@upsilon054 Of course the big wank is nonsense! Most of what is taught in corporate owned quackademia is absolute nonsense for creating a slave population who will use the backwards explosion based technologies owned by the elite, giving them all the money and power in the world to control said slaves with.

[upsilon054]

@77GSlinger Nonsense.

[upsilon054]

@aaronharun No need to research anything, aaron. The universe did not come from a primeval atom or nebula. Maybe you'll answer a question for me. Why are you such an apologist for this guy?

[aaronharun]

@upsilon054 mate ur on the internet so why dnt u research it? im starting to get the idea that ur just trying to be annoying?

[upsilon054]

@aaronharun There was no primeval atom either.

[aaronharun]

@upsilon054 he made a mistake his human for gods sake! i think i figured out ur problem its usualy called primeval atom actualy not primary

[upsilon054]

@aaronharun Because it is not a small thing. There is a big difference between an atom and a nebula. And it is not even true that there was a "primary atom".