Apollo 11 Re-entry onboard cam

Apollo 11 Re-entry onboard cam

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• Apollo
• Re-entry
• NASA
• space
• shuttle

[timpovikings]

Amazing men.

Deniers aren't fit to lick their shoes.

It takes a shocking lack of basic scientific knowledge to disbelieve that NASA could get 2800 ton Saturns up without loss and not set 12 tons down in 1/6th G.

The wonderful thing about conspiracy theorists is, they only have life while they theorise about a myth they have no evidence for. That's some life

[tomco2000]

You Tube doesn' t really exist.

[standauffish]

@ffrgtm Well DUH That was my point. You need to tell that to the guy I was challenging, the post above mine :~D

But Hubble did image the moon Just google Hubble Aristarchus

[ffrgtm]

@KOakaKO Sorry bud, but you're wrong... also there's no such thing as a "far sighted" or "near sighted" telescope.... take your own advice and do a little research before you open your mouth again. And no, you can NOT see hardware on the moon with any current telescope. Fucktard.

[ffrgtm]

@standauffish Objects on the moon aren't visible, not even with the hubble. It's called the "diffraction limit"... you would need a telescope mirror at least 50m in radius to see the the lunar lander skeleton. You need to realize that these amazing photos taken by hubble are of objects usually billions of lightyears wide in size.

[standauffish]

@sahil203 Can you prove it was real? Without using NASA pictures?

:~D

[standauffish]

@KOakaKO Well moron  show me one photo of Apollo hardware on the Moon taken from a telescope... ANY telescope. And google the Hubble images of Aristarchus crater... Then you will understand why I feel comfortable labeling you a moron LMAO

[KOakaKO]

@standauffish - objects left on the moon ARE visible through a good telescope, or even on Google Earth, however your comment about "Hubble" demonstrates your ignorance. Hubble cannot look at the moon because the far-sighted lenses are designed to observe objects outside our solar system. Hubble also can't look at the surface of the Earth, for example. If you're going to call someone a moron, try not to make moronic statements. I doubt you'll succeed, but at least you can try...

[standauffish]

@KOakaKO You saw the hardware through a telescope? LMAO What an idiot you are. Even Hubble isn't powerful enough to see it. Talk about being out of reality What a moron

[ionia23]

Objects left on the moon by NASA are not visible from Earth-based telescopes, not even hubble. But they have been visioned by orbiting lunar satellites recently.

[KOakaKO]

@ApolloWasRealHoax - It's like you're not even trying to troll anymore. I suppose next you'll call me a nazi or something? You're getting predictable, now...

[ApolloWasRealHoax]

@KOakaKO

Dickhead:Supposting actively a crime,like you do here,is a crime by it self.

Do the poor whore you call mother a favor and jump of a bridge.