Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Philosophy of Liberty

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
374,433
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 3, 2006

When you hear Ron Paul say that he stands for the Philosophy of Liberty, this is what he means.

The philosophy of liberty is based on self-ownership. This simple but elegant and hard-hitting animation will explain exactly what that means. It's a great tool anyone can use to educate children and adults about our right to life, liberty, and the property we create - and our responsibility to think, speak and act.

For more info and/or to download a free DVD version of this video, see:

http://www.philosophyofliberty.blogspot.com


CREDITS

AUTHOR: Ken Schoolland schoolak001@hawaii.rr.com
PRODUCER: Kerry Pearson (aka Lux Lucre)
MUSIC: Music2Hues 'Betrayal' http://www.music2hues.com/m2h_orig/flag/_pianoflute.htm
WEBSITE: http://www.jonathangullible.com
SUPPORT: The Jonathan Gullible fund http://www.isil.org/tools/jonathan-gullible.html
COPYRIGHT: http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd-nc/1.0/

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (3,807)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • An ownership society through legislation and the manipulation of both the markets and money supply......a divine comedy.

  • @thebushcomedian what do you think?

  • Libertarian socialism is a logical fallacy.......at no point whatsoever does the Libertarian individualistic philosophy support the position ones right to property is outweighed by anothers nor would any true Libertarian believe it so.

    Libertarian's support charity through free will not the force of government.......socialism is Authoritarian, the polar opposite.

    If you call yourself one you are greatly mistaken.......do some in depth research and find another banner.

    Knowledge is power !

  • Libertarian socialism rules!

  • @Ephisus I never said that the concept of self ownership was obvious. I don't know where you are getting that from. I said that self ownership does not make any sense and that the only thing we can logically deduce is that the self is the self.

  • @ryan84160 Your posit is "the concept of self ownership is incoherent because it is obvious" Mine is that "The concept of self ownership is fundamental because it is obvious." We're debating what "obvious" means. It's not being offered as evidence.

  • @Ephisus I just did. I don't know what it is your are getting at.

  • If this was in text form instead of a video, I would be interested enough to read it all. Yet you somehow managed to make a video about the subject in such an annoying way that I couldnt't even be arsed to watch a whole minute of it...

    Well done.

  • @ryan84160 I invite you to go back and reread the thread.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more