DNA RESULT OF THE BLOOD OF JESUS (continuation)
Top Comments
All Comments (428)
-
Undreadable.
-
@sailguy927 actually I think I've got decent reason to believe he's lied/mistaken. a) Noah's arc is 'discovered' practically every 5 years and that gets disproven shortly after. b) do you really think that discovering the blood of the son of a god wouldn't be Nobel prize shit? Front cover shit?
And lol. I'm sorry but saying I live a 'narrow life' and then saying 'faith is applicable' is laughable. Name 1 aspect of you life (other than religion) in which faith is reasonable for determining truth
-
@ProDegiaque You say; " We only want the truth, if it was true he (Ron Wyatt) wouldn't need to lie, would he?" Somehow God has appointed you the miracle of telling when someone is lying or not. You have no proof in your hand of either yet, because you have none, you default to that it must be a lie. What a narrow life you must live. Faith in things not seen is applicable here. Those without Faith cannot see what the point is. All Mr. Wyatt is guilty of is pointing to Christ, is this so bad
-
Can anybody read the writing on the video? What was the outcome?
-
I think blood of any kind, would be DRIED and coagulated. It would've turned very dark or close to black after 2,000 years. But, not being an expert in any -ologies, just an Aircraft Electronics tech in the Navy, I can't say. In my experience, God reveals certain things over time, to give testimony of His existence. Here's an example. I hated Georgia, having grown up here and was in my beloved Texas. Guess where I've been 17 years. I told God I weren't moving back to Georgia...ummm, back again
-
@sailguy927 yes he's pointing to Christ but us 'evil' people only believe things with evidence and reason behind them, if he's presented bad evidence ofc we're not gonna believe him. We only want the truth, if it was true he wouldn't need to lie, would he?
-
People think! What is the payoff of Ron Wyatt here with regards to Christ's blood? Deception? Deception of what??? That Christ existed? That Christ lived and died for us? Even if this wasn't His blood, so what? Ron Wyatt is only still pointing to Christ and the only pay off is people becoming believers. Now, if you were evil would you really want a person like Ron Wyatt have any credibility? Wouldn't an evil person say, "Don't fall for it". So what, if you have your salvation? Think!
-
So is it the DNA of grapes?
Don't fall for it, people- it's not Christ's blood. And if it is a miracle, it's source is evil- the bible warns us that in the last days there will be signs and wonders of a deceptive nature. Safe guard yourself, and read your bible- the warnings AND solutions are all there.
MaestroJah 1 year ago 20
It's been awhile since I studied geneology and blood typing, but I was told that AB is a 'modern' blood type. Meaning it's kind of new. Where as the O blood type is ancient being found in older American natives, Africaan natives, Celts, and people of Hebrew descent. So, I'm thinking if this was the blood of the Christ, it should be a powerful O .
Run4MeLife 9 months ago 3