Kill More Babies To Save Earth - Alex Jones

Following the leak of a United Nations blueprint which outlined the plan to replace fearmongering about global warming with the contrived threat of overpopulation, a Scientific American report mimics precisely that talking point, pushing the notion that programs of mass abortion and birth control need to be encouraged in order to reduce the amount of humans on the planet exhaling carbon dioxide.

"Ultimately, family planning alone -- such as the use of condoms and other reproductive health services -- in parts of the world with growing populations, including the U.S., could restrain population growth significantly, this analysis finds," writes David Biello.

To back up his argument, Biello links to an article by the completely discredited eugenicist Paul Ehrlich, who once stated that "everyone will disappear in a cloud of blue steam."

Ehrlich, who co-authored Ecoscience with White House Science Czar John P. Holdren, the textbook that advocates putting drugs in the water supply to sterilize people, mandatory forced abortions, and a tyrannical eco-fascist dictatorship run by a "planetary regime," is infamous for his spectacularly inaccurate predictions about how overpopulation would destroy the environment.

The article cited by Biello advocates a mass public relations campaign targeted at women to encourage them to have abortions in order to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. In other words, more babies need to be killed to prevent them from exhaling CO2. Coincidentally, the cover of the Scientific American issue in which the article appears features a set of human skulls.

As we revealed in a report last month, the true agenda behind fanning the flames of fears about overpopulation is to reduce living standards globally, by preventing the third world from ever becoming economically prosperous, while also eviscerating the middle classes of western nations.

A leaked UN blueprint concerning the need to re-energize the move towards global government outlined a plan to re-brand global warming as "overpopulation" as a means of dismantling the middle classes while using "global redistribution of wealth" and increased immigration to reinvigorate the pursuit of a one world government.

The aim of globalist institutions is to "limit and redirect the aspirations for a better life of rising middle classes around the world," in other words to reduce the standard of living for the middle classes in Western Europe and America.

Similarly, in his report, Biello decries the potential that "richer people" would lead to more consumption, once again revealing the eugenicist fervor that environmentalists embrace in deliberately preventing the third world from lifting itself out of poverty and mass starvation.

In reality, whenever a country is allowed to develop and become more prosperous, population figures drop naturally, underscoring the fact that environmentalists do not really care about the threat posed by overpopulation, their primary concern is the threat posed to the elite by a stronger middle class globally.

Environmental controls which prevent third world nations from developing infrastructure are fueling overpopulation, starvation and misery, which is precisely how the elitists want it to remain.

Warnings about the threat posed by overpopulation are fundamentally flawed. In reality, underpopulation will be seen as the biggest danger to human prosperity in the latter half of the 21st century.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• bill
• gates
• microsoft
• al
• gore
• georgia
• guide
• stones
• U.N.
• population
• reduction
• eugenics
• endgame
• alex
• jones
• infowars
• news
• analysis
• documentary
• television
• finance
• talk show
• debate
• economy
• discussion
• conspiracy theory
• politics
• communism
• hot topics
• commentary
• talking
• interviews

[HighhBrid]

GUNNShop

[TheBoredomOtaku]

Farm animals produce more CO2 and similar gases than the human population...and if people want to worry about CO2 as a reason to kill babies then plant more tree's to balance out the ammount of CO2 released and stop using older power methods of burning coal and using fossil fuels...

[dredonBIRDYbird]

@TheBoredomOtaku yeah i know i totally disagree with this its just that humans need to step it up a bit, if you know what i mean

[TheBoredomOtaku]

@dredonBIRDYbird Yes humans screwed up the planet but hey we are here now so killing each otehr isn't the solution, especially innocent babies.

[dredonBIRDYbird]

@TheBoredomOtaku exactly ...but humans litter and hunt animals for fun and other stuff...my point is that the planet would be more healtheir if humans were extinct

[Spelfr]

Look at the cows

Do you know the Cockroachs are constantly Farting?

[TheBoredomOtaku]

@dredonBIRDYbird There are more farm animals on the planet than humans by far, humans only produce more CO2 because we are too stupid to change the way we produce electricity and power industry still pumping out CO2 due to our own industry.

[dredonBIRDYbird]

@TheBoredomOtaku are you stupid? humans produce more co2 than ANYTHING and are responsible for hundreds of extinctions...lol

[DeadMarine1980]

Population control is not about exhaling less co2 dummy! It is about less food and energy consumption.

[HardcoreGamer10000]

thanks for this.

This will serve as one of the proofs for my "Philippine RH Bill Conspiracy" hypothesis.