3 Intelligent questions EVERY Atheist should answer

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
92,586
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 31, 2008

Reminders about my questions




-------------------------
flat world = true

geocentric world = true

evolution = true
------------------------------
science = concensus

religon = concensus

Is religon as true as science ?
--------------------------------
Do you want people to believe what you do?

Do you have acess to the truth?
--------------------------------

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 728 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (4,531)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • ask prof brian cox you fat greasy cuny small dick cunt

  • q1. Science builds models that are called "A THEORY" that explains phenomena. Whenever a better working model is built the older is discarded. The experiment not our beliefs decide.

    q2. Go to 1.

    q3. We don't force anything. The Mother Narure does. You can use Youtube thank's to that. If you don't agree that we have a better insight don't use technology please.

  • 3)I do not automatically believe that I am smarter than theists, and while their views are sometimes harmful to the human race as a whole (not allowed to teach evolution in some schools, gay rights denied, etc) they often times are more compassionate and nicer people. The sad fact is its mass delusion, the hardcore bible thumper would be just as hardcore about another religion if they were born where that religion is prevalent.

  • 2)The difference between the scientific community believing something and the religious community believing something is that the scientific community start believing things after they have OBSERVED them, tested them, and proven them. If the religious community could give me just ONE observable fact, I would be more inclined to believe them.

  • 1)That was the best they could observe with the science of the time. After a while you reach a level of technology to indisputably prove something. So just as there is no longer ANY doubt that the earth is round and that it goes around the sun, there is no longer ANY doubt among the scientific community that we evolved from primates. To believe otherwise is as incorrect as believing the Earth is flat. And just as people fought to hang on to that idea, people fight to hang on to these silly ones.

  • That's all evolution is a non-lethal mutation, variation to the environment, as a result of the mutation a advantage to the variation, and a increase of prevalence of the species with that specific mutation over time these mutations accumulate and form different species. ( Species is defined as a group of organisms that can reproduce and make fertile, healthy offspring)

    I've probably made a mistake somewhere in these paragraphs someone please correct me if you find a mistake i'm too tired. NIGHT

  • The Speckled black moth was generally white in colour with black speckles upon it's wings, these made it blend in to the lichen growing on trees, now after the industrial revolution coal fumes blackened the trees making the moth easy to see by would be predators, but among the speckled moths were a darker melanic form of moth with their colours inversed, these were quite rare till the industrial revolution when the melanic form of moth survived and became more abundant.

  • Bits of evidence, can be seen with the naked eye they're called vestigial organs and exist in all humans from body hair, to segregated abdominal muscles, to the humble appendix a vestigial stomach from when our ancestors ate more vegetation and less meat (one stomach cannot fully digest leaves, grass, branches).

    But to get to point quickly I shall just tell you the tale of the speckled black moth native to the united kingdom.

  • So general trend is that the older a organism is in terms of millions of years the more basic it is.

    Now creationists sometimes mistakenly believe, that evolution is something of a jump between one species to another, this is not the case homo Sapiens didn't just come from apes it took millions of years from Australopithecus (who had a more ape like ancestor), to homo Habilis, to homo Erectus and finally to homo Sapiens and evidence of this transition between species lies in our very bodies.

  • Okay, lets start with question number 1.

    Is evolution true given that theories about our world from the past have been proven to be incorrect.

    For starters a general rule of thumb in paleontology is that the further down something is buried the older it is. Now from what we have discovered in that the deeper we dig the more basic the fossils we find, as decrease in number of cells, less likely to have vertebrae, decreased brain size.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more