Demonstration of a 1611 Matchlock Musket

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,296
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 26, 2010

Historical Interpreter John Pagano presents a detailed presentation and demonstration of DeGeyn's Manual of Arms for the early 17th century Matchlock Musket.

**DISCLAIMER** This video is not intended to be used as a training video, but instead as an educational resource and demonstration. The interpreters at Henricus Historical Park are trained professionals with years of black powder experience. Please DO NOT attempt to fire a black powder musket without the direct supervision of a trained and experienced black powder specialist.

http://www.henricus.org

Henricus Historical Park
251 Henricus Park Rd.
Chester, VA

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (42)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @asmrbear

    No, Wheel locks does not use flint, cause flint would shatter against the spinning wheel. A wheel lock mechanism uses pyrite.

  • @asmrbear Yes, I made mistake about that. thank you ^.^ ! Wheel locks are crazy! Having to be made by a master clock maker!

  • @thestarsandbars wheellocks followed matchlocks. They used flint in their mechanism.

    By the mid C17, wheellock pistols were seen alongside matchlock muskets, but were very rare as they were crazy expensive and a bit of a pain to make and maintain in combat (effectively like having a very sensitive watch mechanism on the side of your pistol). By the time wheel locks had been perfected,the dogjaw style flint lock was in use :)

  • @Metaldude1945: They probably fired in turns with one group firing while another reloaded.

  • @Metaldude1945 Most of the killing was done with swords, daggers, pikes and crossbows.. The Matchlock, when it did reliably fire, was devastating, but the boom it made truly scared the natives shitless.

  • @Metaldude1945 Why would you need to outnumber anything when you have such superior weaponry?

  • @Metaldude1945 Well they did have canons back then, next you have to realize that they had great dragoons even then, .. so most of the time it would be enough to scare the native tribals.

  • Must of been nervewrecking to fight with such slow loading weapons against Native American tribes. I always wondered how they managed to actually win. Did they have certain tactics? Outnumbering?

  • sorry, but 200 yards my A**. A P1853 Rifle Musket (w/ Mine ball) a trained soldier could only hit up to 300 yards. Most matchlocks could only hit up to 60 yards

  • @AlexPrestage Ah, thanks, I've heard the 18th century cavalry armor called a cuirass, as well as Alexandrian-era breastplates, so I'm sure people use it in a more broadened spectrum than was intended.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more