Debate Introduction

Kirk and Ray explain their position on the debate.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Kirk
• Cameron
• Ray
• Comfort
• ABC
• debate
• ABCnews.com
• Rational
• Response
• Squad
• Way
• of
• the
• Master

[rbairos1]

Science is not based on 100% accuracy. In fact, the reason it is so powerful is because it welcomes verification of its results. Trial and error, experimenation, and refining the model as new data is gathered is what its all about.

[Knowntje]

like what? talking snakes? all kinds of animals with an old man on a boat? A zombie who was his own father sacrificing himself to himself? A piece of fruit containing knowledge of good and evil? people living up to 900 years? a woman getting turned into a pillar of salt for looking at a city getting brimstoned? An man with the power of imhuman strenght in his hair? 4 horseman marking the end of the world in a computerage? hmm.. yeah

[thekillerghost123]

I'm an atheist and I'm so sick of logic and facts. I just wish there was a way the we could have an answer for everything written in book. That is why I'm converting to Christianity don't be shy my fellow atheists there is plenty of ignorant bliss to go around. It feels so good to finally have some one judging my every mistake and dissension. Oh but wait my mother wasn't married when she when she gave birth to me. Bible says I can't enter church. Well Christianity was fun while it lasted.

[devonbiker]

The problem with science evolution is thats it's too arrogant! It's arrogant by presuming it's right, those who defend evolution often look down on those of faith. The debate shows that. Evolution is not proper science because we weren't there to witness it, yet evolutionists arrogantly set themselves up as the all knowing ones! Evolution is utter rubbish and requires alot more faith to accept as fact. Evolution science supposition is all wrong which = wrong answers!

[randallfe]

@carolinaagb and lighting shows that zues exists

[oldblubblub]

And in conclusion, Brian and Kelly owned you.

[a1saouse]

Kirk : we would first present clear evidence of god threw creation.scripture says that the no big brainier.END QUOTE... I'm just a lost soul... can you explain to me why its so important for others to believe god exist... and why do

I relate you proving the existence of god , like Satan tried to prove if Jesus was truly the son of god. in other words if Jesus himself turned away temptation and three of those temptations was to prove who Jesus was... why do you use science to prove who god is?

[sexyAllen4u]

@buckbeak1965 LOL Thanks I appreciate that

[buckbeak1965]

@sexyAllen4u , I just listend to you're vid kiddo' and all I have to say is WOW, you have a great gift of music. keep up the good work.

[sexyAllen4u]

@buckbeak1965 I have tested it for about uhhh....ever since I was about 7. It is not standing up to reality very well at all.

[robtay1963]

@Knowntje The 900 year old part may be true. I have read that man before the knowledge of the cosmos calculated age by the full moons, about 12 months times 75 years equal 900, ....Think about it, at the time of Noah they did had no clue what a year was, they thought sun revolved around the earth. By the time men put stories to writing they knew but left it as in original stories. I don't believe Noah existed but the stories of Noah would have made his age fit the counting system of the time.