UCSB Security Group's Attack on Voting Machines (Part 2 of 2

The video shows how voting machines can be compromised and modified by a virus that steals votes from unsuspecting users

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Voting
• E-Voting
• Security
• Hacking
• Vulnerability
• Analysis

[mp3cdripper]

This is so pathetic it's not even funny. They've figured out so many ways to change votes with this thing I doubt it would ever even be detected. These things need to be vetted by the same guys in Vegas that test slot machines. They may still be hackable but I guarantee they'll be better than this crap.

[wilhelmrahn]

Paper votes ftw

[derman077]

Whew, It's a good thing they don't actually use those those things.

[natfre]

The negative comments about the creators of the video are some of the dumbest comments I have ever read on YouTube, and that is saying a lot.

Also, it is spelled "contradictory" and "infallible." At least the fact that you don't know how to spell the words is a good tip-off that you have little to no idea what they mean.

[67hgfwwy]

riggznit good point. Computer Scientists that are against using electronic machines? What? That seems to be a little contidictary to their pursuits in life? It's good enough for phones, computers, banking, wallstreet, the news, the internet, your car, your pursuit in life. But not with voting. ??? What?? What is their angle? Everyone has an angle. The guy with the ponytail seems to be a serious tool. I seen him in anyother video where he ranked the machine as a 7. Thats my lucky number.

[67hgfwwy]

Well eXXO as the crazies would say out there. If you have a unique personal mark on the ballot that would clearly not be TRANSPARENT CONFIDENTIALITY.

You really don't get the whole picture. Your idea of how voting should go doesn't speak on behalf of the majority. Your complaints are the minority and as all know that nothing is infaluable the amount of faluability is the question. Not the fact that it is faluable.

[eXX0]

So you don't want the guy who counts the vote to know what you voted for? How is he supposed to count your vote then? That doesn't mean you put your NAME on the ballot, of course, duh!

[riggznit]

The fact is people these guys. So called Computer scientists insist on paper? Without putting paper through the same red team attack with paper experts? No that isn't a complete study that is ignorant and irresponsible and should completely discredit anything these guys have to say at all. Come on who are the idiots here? They don't even know that voting process has to be confidential by law. Do you want your dickhead boss a dedicated Republican to know you voted Democratic?

[riggznit]

erotocharter, Moronic can't be associated with fact. The fact that your red team attack was an unrealistic and not taking into acount the actual voting process. To attack a machine as if it stands alone without other safe guards is fictious and irresponsible. Your simple mind has not taking into account all the other safequards in place. Anything man built can be taken apart so with that said, Are you saying we shouldn't vote at all?

Come on say something else stupid!! Love It!!!

[eratocharter]

Why do some of you moronic posters assume UCSB is attacking Sequoia? UCSB is simply saying that anyone, whether affiliated with the manufacturer or not, can tamper with the machine and its components. DUH.

[eratocharter]

Hey - good idea! Now why aren't we using fingerprinting?