Climate Change: Is the Science "Settled"?

(February 4, 2010) Stephen Schneider, professor of biology at Stanford and senior fellow at the Woods Institute for the Environment, unpacks the political and scientific debates surrounding climate change.

This course was originally presented in Stanford's Continuing Studies program.

Stanford University:
http://www.stanford.edu/

Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford:
http://woods.stanford.edu/

Stanford Continuing Studies Program:
http://csp.stanford.edu/

Stanford University Channel on YouTube:
http://www.youtube.com/stanford

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Science
• technology
• energy
• policy
• politics
• natural resources
• environment
• climate change
• temperature
• IPCC
• Nobel Prize
• system science
• global warming
• climate models
• balloon
• atmosphere
• National Academy

[MrOTLChamp]

@Viracocha711 Here's another e-mail for you Jones: "I too don’t see why the schemes should be symmetrical. The temperature ones

certainly will not as we’re choosing the periods to show warming."

Question. Do you really think that choosing temperatures to show warming is not manipulating the data to force the conclusion of warming?

Gee, how could all those so-called investigations have missed that? LMAO

I know, it's all a coincidence. Huh?

[MrOTLChamp]

@Viracocha711 Manns graph was only partially replicated by his colleagues. There is over a thousand peer-reviewed papers saying otherwise. Was there a MWP? Yes, according to data published by 1050 individual scientists from 600 research institutions in 44 different countries ... and counting! What did you have? 12? LMAO

[Viracocha711]

@MrOTLChamp Like I have said in your PM to me & other comments...You need to go learn what CO2 is & its characteristics because if you don't even know the basics, and clearly you don't, how can you understand that every paper you copy & paste from Professional Denialist websites all agree with the consensus! And you clearly don't know that Mann's graph has been replicated by at 12 other studies by different people using different methodologies. Talk to you later.

[MrOTLChamp]

@Viracocha711 And Mann's graph is still unsupported by the facts.

I've already shown you plenty of peer-reviewed reports from all over the world showing similar changes during the MWP

[MrOTLChamp]

@Viracocha711 You still haven't explained how a "bodge" is used if it's not to Fake the temperatures.

[MrOTLChamp]

@Viracocha711 email 0932158667 " Also, there is no evidence for a decline or loss of temperature response in your data in the post-1950s (I assume that you didn’t apply a bodge here) …

[MrOTLChamp]

@Viracocha711 That shows how they tried to get their consensus

[MrOTLChamp]

 They will mention the prominent ones, but that is a different story.

Conclusion—Forget the screening, forget asking them about their last publication (most will ignore you). Get those names!"

[MrOTLChamp]

@Viracocha711 I can show some things to be true that 1000frolly said.

1). email 0876437553 "Sounds like you guys have been busy doing good things for the cause.

I would like to weigh in on two important questions—

Distribution for Endorsements— Cont...

[Viracocha711]

@1000frolly Either send me PROOF of your claims or just shut up because we both know you can't support the absurd claims you have made! I will be waiting!!