Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Umpires TV: Defensive Interference

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,607
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 24, 2007

Umpires TV Video Board Challenge
Now You Make the Call!
Here's the play, defensive interference, do you know the answer?

Category:

Sports

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (exposfan1)

  • All our video vignettes were supervised by Jim Evan, proprietor of the Academy of Professional Umpiring. He is a former MLB umpire and runs one of the 2 official shcools of umpiring that leads to a professional baseball opportunity.

    Not all cases of obstruction are immediately a dead ball. Please look before you so harshly leap next time

see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @TheCliffater Again the phrasing is wrong here. Obstruction is ruled aganst defense, inteference is offensive. With proof of rule 7.07, I will agree that MLB rules will allow the run to score. Remember there is no such thing as catcher "interference", it is obstruction on the catcher. It's very similar to the over the back that people cry for in basketball, there is no such foul. It's commonly a push.

  • @mrlaymansterms1 you are tho one who's wrong whit all respect, in this situation you must call interferience of the catchar plus balk and they both should be aplied, i mean, runner scores and batter goes to first base. i wasn't obstruccion it ws interferience.

  • @EDGYKNIFE tell my umps that

  • This is the exact situation for which a specific rule was created or written.

    See rule 7.07 of the official rules of Baseball per MLB.

    "If, with a runner on third base and trying to score by means of a squeeze play or a

    steal, the catcher or any other fielder steps on, or in front of home base without possession of the ball, or touches the batter or his bat, the pitcher shall be charged with a balk, the batter shall be awarded first base on the interference and the ball is dead."

    A: #3

  • Your all wrong and even this video is wrong. First off, it's called obstruction, not interferance. Obstruction is an immediate dead ball situation, that means that all play freezes. Since th ball was dead prior to the tag or the runner from 3rd crossing the dish, he must return to 3rd base. The batter is awarded 1st. The only way that the runner from 3rd scores is if the bases are loaded at the time of obstruction, therefore forcing him home. I'm willing to listen if you have rule or case #'s.

  • @buddaman200522 You must be calling me a dumbass then, I don't know any level of ball that doesn't call defensive "obstruction" a dead ball. In that case the batter is awarded first base. The only way that the runner from third would be awarded home is if he's forced home by trail runners. Do you have a rule or case number to support your train of thought?

  • @mrlaymansterms1

    Yep, obstruction is defense, interference is offense.

  • Idiots, that is not the right call. Interference is offensive. It's call obstruction

  • yeah #3

    it would be like a catchers interference in which the batter is awarded first

    then it would be like a ball going out of play and the runner is awarded the next base

    so the guy on 3rd gets home

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more