Tires vs. Mattracks

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,818,191
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 13, 2008

This is a short comparison demonstrating the difference between tires and tracks. 44" tires with Dana 60's and lockers would not get you through the snow like the Mattracks. Yes, they are more expensive, and not for everyone, but if you need to get through snow, mud, sand or any other soft material they cannot be beat.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • I need this for the zombie apocalypse

  • I wanna see a burnout.

see all

All Comments (1,704)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • THAT THING IS A TANK!

  • @5kawasaki They dig down to the hard stuff. thats how they work

  • Nifty. Once I get my Jeep running again I might get a set

  • @THEJBUDS right...

  • HUMMERS SUCK. JEEP!

  • Fuck snow, i have Mattracks

  • @THEJBUDS studded tires don't do anything in the soft stuff, same concept as picks on a sled, all they help with is traction on hard packed and ice

  • lift kit+balloon tires= you don't need this

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more