TV2 Tabloid Interview with historian David Irving 2009 05 26 Part 1

Norwegian TV2 - Interview with historian David Irving

NRK interview with David Irving (Oct.18, 2008)
at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-iz6H5432g

Irving's webpage: http://www.fpp.co.uk/online

David Irving - A Radical's Diary: http://www.fpp.co.uk/docs/Irving/RadDi/2009/260509.html

The Norwegian Festivale of Literature and the David Irving Controversy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_Festival_of_Literaturehtml

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• David
• Irving
• hitler
• holocaust
• jews
• jewish
• revisionism
• real
• history
• Norway
• Norwegian
• Festivale
• of
• Literature
• Norsk
• Litteraturfestival

[RockAndRollMassacre]

i've seen irving speak and i do not believe he is a nazi, he says he would not like a bnp government in britain or a far right regime in germany

he speaks the truth about jewish supremacism and obviously for this they will not give him a moments rest

[wroughtwithfraud]

the "religion of persecution" is wholly reliant upon the many transparent "persecution narratives" or else would disintegrate. The historical narratives "Exodus', "Fall of Jerusalem" and "Holocaust" are all wrought with fraud.

-

"Power don't come from a badge or a gun. Power comes from lying. Lying big and gettin' the whole damn world to play along with you. Once you've got everybody agreeing with what they know in their hearts ain't true, you've got 'em by the balls." -- 'Sin City' (2005)

[belinda2118]

David Irving is a brilliant historian.

[Wassouf10]

@bariguy87 You are an idiot!

[bariguy87]

@RockAndRollMassacre

He's a moron.

[bariguy87]

This just shows that David Irving is an idiot.

[typicalmelburnian]

@MoveOverCasanova You can say that "conspiracy theory" is a fashionable term, but that's irrelevant - the term has a meaning. Go and look up the term "conspiracy theory" on Wikipedia. That's what I'm talking about here.

As to who judges what is and is not truth, that's a fair question to ask. The answer, in this case, is that we must all examine the evidence and we must have some understanding about how sources are used, and how historians do their work. That is the key.

[MoveOverCasanova]

@typicalmelburnian "conspiracy theory" -- congratulations for using such fashionable language...btw i am hopeful you can tell me who judges it wheter it is the "truth" or only a "conspiracy theory" - and btw2, "even if you are paranoid, it doesn´t mean that they´re not after you" some wise man said!!

"a questionable historian" -- well that is a term irving could live with i guess, but this is not common sense

[typicalmelburnian]

@MoveOverCasanova How is my view far from neutral? I'm observing and pointing out flaws in Irving's argument. Conspiracy theories are often a sign of paranoia and they are a good indicator of a lack of neutrality, or ability to weigh evidence appropriately. I'm not saying Irving is "mad", I just think that he is a questionable historian. It is appropriate to challenge his assertions - we should all do this, if we care about history, accuracy and evidence.

[Quex01]

But you lost, but you lost! Haha, i fucking hate television, it turns people literally into morons.