Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

This Politically Incorrect FACT Will Suprise You!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
147,826
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 14, 2007

http://survivalgearchecklist.net An economic collapse is imminent... is your family prepared?... food, shelter, water.

  • likes, 112 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @GloryBound87 "and more than a handful of new Supreme Court justices, so clearly changing the law by voting hasn't worked. Filing suit hasn't worked. What other option is left except for nullification?"

    Okay, I get it now. Even though you keep saying "we the people", you don't actually believe in democracy. If every Congress for the past 40 years hasn't tried to repeal the law, then the people obviously want it to stay. You prefer oligarchy, where a small group can overrule the people.

  • @GloryBound87 "What if the Supreme Court upholds a clearly unconstitutional law?"

    Congress made the law, the President approved it, the Supreme Court confirmed its constitutionality. If you don't like the law, you have to wait until the next elections. Then you can elect officials who will change the law.

    "We, the People, have no recourse?"

    No, because the people elected the federal officials. The people have to deal with their decisions.

see all

All Comments (3,571)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @GloryBound87

    Yep. I think people lose perspective as it was 150 years ago and the nation was so different then politically, socially and technologically. All parties on both sides were working in self-interest. Many abolitionists fought slavery for altruistic reasons, for example, but many others were small landowners who feared the power of huge plantation owners. A sort-of 99% vs. 1% argument at the time.

    It's hard to discuss this intelligently as people get so emotional

  • My Founding Fathers knew their actions violated British law, and they'd be hung to death if they lost, like Nathan Hale. They didn't spend much time whining to the contrary. But my Founding Fathers didn't fight for a "cornerstone" of racism and slavery. The confederacy did. That's why the CSA is supported today by a few sick assholes who hate America and the Constitution, and wish states could engage in slavery, segregation and other unfettered tyranny under a reinstated Articles of Confederacy.

  • @GloryBound87 That's ridiculous. Of course there are times when fighting is the right moral choice. The Civil War isn't one of them, spammer. The South had no legal right to unilateral secession, and no moral right---unless you don't think slavery and racism are wrong. You should drop the act and argue the REAL reason you believe millions of black people and their descendants deserved MORE years of slavery and segregation.

  • @kuwinsitall I agree. I don't have any illusions for why the Southern states seceded, nor about why they lost. The Union beat them. The war's over.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more