Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

"State of the Arts" Interviews Thereminist Scott Marshall

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,022
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 25, 2007

On the NJ Network "State of the Arts" a thereminist demonstrates and talks about the oddest and most difficult musical instrument, the first electronic instrument, the Theremin. Interview by Amber Edwards.

Category:

Music

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (MisterScott99)

  • It makes sense that Robert Moog picked up on this concept.

  • Why do you say that?

  • Wonderful playing by Scott. The commentary stating that the theremin "creates an electromagnetic field," however, is irrelevant. Electromagnetism is not the main basis for the theremin's operation.

  • Amber didn't say it was the "main basis" and I think her simplification was quite helpful for her audience. The theremin DOES create an electromagnetic field, and it DOES modify the sound (pitch and volume) to move in that field, so she is not incorrect. What is YOUR explanation for the "main basis" for the theremin's operation?

  • While the oscillators in the Etherwave theremin do use coils, and electromagnetic waves are relevant to them, it is the variation of electrostatic coupling of the hands to the instrument's electrodes (aka "antennas") that cause the changes in pitch and volume due to changes in capacitance varying with hand-to-electrode distance. If the electromagnetic fields from the coils were completely shielded, the theremin would still work.

  • I see what you're saying. However, there are ways to produce an electromagnetic field without a coil, such as a radio transmitting antenna. In fact, the electrostatic and electromagnetic fields are two manifistations of the same basic force. What if she had said it was an electrostatic field instead of an electromagnetic field? Would she then have been correct?

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Right.

  • The instrument really reminds me of the 50's and art deco

  • This is the first synthesizer most likely Moog was inspired by it.

  • In my opinion, it is more correct to cite the electrostatic field. Your point regarding a radio transmission is well taken, and I agree that the two fields are part and parcel of the same physical principles.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more