Entangled Awareness and OBEs

To read along go to: http://imaginingthetenthdimension.blogspot.com/2010/05/entangled-awareness-an...
Other links from this entry:
http://imaginingthetenthdimension.blogspot.com/2007/05/waveforms-in-ten-dimen...
http://dreaminglife.org/rob-bryanton-author-of-imagining-the-10th-dimension-v...
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627596.000-seven-wonders-of-the-quant...
http://www.amazon.com/My-Stroke-Insight-Scientists-Personal/dp/0670020745
http://www.tenthdimension.com/medialinks.php
For lyrics and more discussion of closing song:
http://imaginingthetenthdimension.blogspot.com/2008/02/song-14-of-26-i-rememb...

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Entangled
• Awareness
• and
• OBEs
• out
• of
• body
• experiences
• quantum
• spookiness
• entanglement
• dreams
• lucid
• dreaming
• physics
• philosophy
• tenthdimension
• tenth
• dimension
• fifth
• Bryanton

[ptotzke]

The problem I have with the many worlds theory is (in a deterministic sense) it only seems to be related to (human) thought and choice, and would only make sense if the beginning (big bang?) was different for each world. Otherwise it would seem pointless to have many worlds that were exact copies of the other worlds. I'm not an advocate of determinism nor reductionism, but without life, the theory doesn't seem to make sense or seem useful. If you have any videos, it would be appreciated.

[10thdim]

@ptotzke Exactly! The conclusion is that there is an indeterminate cloud of possible universes, and possible states for those universes, and that until life exerts an organizing pattern to observe one or another that indeterminacy remains. Have you read much about Local Realism or the Biocentric Universe theory?

watch?v=ehIbaoouPQk

watch?v=c4S9hAkGbyY

watch?v=9ZWVai-4DUU

Thanks for writing!

Rob

[DkleinD]

It seems to me that because life has exerted an organizing pattern up to this point in the "inward-outward" frequencies, the only possible way to describe "that which there is little information about"(the universe), is by using information that has already been described by the organizing force. It is a reflection that is becoming more clear. The process of understanding the reflection is time.

[Protoworks]

@andrewmanford Nor is the much evidence of any other dimensional science, as Rob has stated in his other videos, this is just a theory, just like most other dimensional ideas.

[dbs55denis]

@MikeRoePhonicsMusic nah i think i wont. fuck off grammer nazi bitch.

[MikeRoePhonicsMusic]

@dbs55denis Let's try that again in English.

[daPawlak]

@10thdim But isn't indeterminate just a part of determinated higher perfection? It seems like a kind of "if the tree falls in the forest and there's no one. to observe" question

[DoctorTachyon]

@rsnitemare463 Where is the evidence?Did you just bring up leaps of faith in a science discussion? Who is naive here? THERE IS NO EVIDENCE for the multiverse. Not one bit. A math equation is not empirical data. Science requires empirical data from theory. You take the theory and disregard the need to provide evidence. Well you do have faith. Who needs evidence? Great claims require great evidence.

[rsnitemare463]

@DoctorTachyon You are very naive. Great things are difficult to do with out leaps of faith. Simply disregarding something because it can not be proven before your eyes in a way you can understand is "foolishness"

[tautologicalnickname]

How do you explain individuals with perfect memory? even if I don't really know the extent of this perfection...

[dbs55denis]

+hes just saying things in fancy terms. basicly

If u do somthing that requires desicion making morso than somthing basic, you remember it more, if u do somthing thats simple and controlled by ur subconcious, you dont remember it asmuch >.>

[dbs55denis]

this is fucking weird ass BS its a lucid dream not an OBE ur body chemicly relesiase DIMETHYL TRIPTOMINE and u can have CONTROLL OVER IT if u realize ur dreaming and u can train ur mind to remember so this is rediculous and this guys an attention hoar.

[Theyallfloatdownhere]

@DoctorTachyon We both have something in common. That is great.

[DoctorTachyon]

@Theyallfloatdownhere faith in a tool or faith in an equation. Which is more foolish? You do not know me or what I believe. Check my page you will see. I too have knowledge that does not come from a text book, but that knowledge has been shown to me through constant evidence in my life to let me know that it is real. This here has no evidence from science and no evidence in the real world.You call me pathetic for not believing this stuff the moment I hear it? Interesting...