Sachiko Kodama, Yasushi Miyajima "Morpho Towers -- Two Stand

can i buy some at a educational store or science shop for a few dollars?

that thing is pure EVIL

Ignorance of what exactly? I'm offering an opinion that the stereotypical image of a scientist (anyone who creates a new revolutionary invention) in American culture is a much more creative profession than the stereotypical image of an artist (anybody who draws). Obviously an individual working under either title could be super creative or extremely unoriginal, especially given the broad nature of what constitutes a "scientist" or "artist" and the vague nature of the stereotype...

No this is a bad opinion, like you said there's a lot of cross-disciplinary ignorance between the visual arts and "science." Speaking from a perspective that is sadly exceptional -- I am a lifelong artist working and an aspiring Doctor of Pathology currently studying and working at Johns Hopkins -- I can assure you that you're speaking from ignorance here.

If I could get one I would buy it now

Giga....Drill....BREAKER?

Yes but not in comparison to the initial post I was responding to of: Artists are bad at science and Scientists are bad at art." If you notice, I'm referring to the majority of things commonly accepted as "art" or "science" in pop culture. My point is that the stereotypical scientist is actually much more creative than the stereotypical artist. Only it's youtube comments so I didn't have the space to get that across without generalizing.

Cracked!

your statement uses too many sweeping generalizations.

CRACKED!