How high to you have to be to think this makes any sense. Sure, it's funny, but---informative? NO! Logical? NO! Convincing? NO! I guess somebody must have gotten a grant, HUH?
methane gas ... hmmmm ok i want you to go behind your car, and inhale your exhuast for a few minutes... back yet... o u DIDNT pass out. GOOD - ok
not burn some ethnol...go ahead..ill wait....
still waiting.... ya...im waiting cuz if you inhaled ethenol gas exhaust, youd pass out if you did the same amount of time as a petrol car - learn wtf chemicals do when burned jackass before trying to convince us of bullshit.
Why don't you go and read about Nuclear Fusion, not the same as fission. This is the same type of power that our sun uses to make so big lights, Guess what it's the same and it lasts for a very, long time. Why don't you and all of the other simple people look beyond your nose. Coal is dirty, fission is dirty. Fusion is the answer. We're close, this is where the money needs to go.The size of a Fusion generator can be small, or big. Google this and read, read, and read some more. Bless you
Don't waste your time trying to explain science to liberals. Many of these anti-coal activists embrace ethanol (C2H5OH), even though they both produce the same carbon dioxide when burned.
Methane is twenty times as potent of a greenhouse gas as CO2, and both are produced naturally by every animal on the planet.
I wouldn't be surprised if Al Gore is behind this group. Coal is his biggest competitor, and if the "green" companies he owns aren't making money, then Al Gore isn't making money.
Nuclear energy is the answer to our coal problem. No current energy source provides enough constant power or base power, except nuclear. If Americans could just get past the stigma that comes with nuclear power we'd be much better off.
Morons... :-( If you eliminate the coal fire plants on campus they will still get their power/heat from coal, but it will just be generated somewhere else. All you are doing is adding more efficiency drops by adding more steps.
You will pollute more.
Coal is likely the clean option for generating enough heat for an entire campus. Natural gas is probably an option too, but I already pay enough for school without adding that cost.
You should find a solution, and then feel free to bitch.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Get rid of those wasteful jobs, We dont need to keep shit jobs like taking care of the elderly. Let them die. We dont need hostess to make more cakes. WE dont need cheetos factories. We dont need soda factories. Now we have enough from alternate energies. Also Nuclear power is great.
Very well, the Sierra Club doesn't like coal power. How shocking.
The real question then is what will replace coal? Your favorites wind, solar, etc. don't make up enough power to replace what would be lost by eliminating coal. You are against nuclear energy.
It's fine to be against coal but before we start taxing everyone that uses it to death we need a replacement that FULLY makes up for it. This way businesses can still have power and provide jobs.
Love this - very funny. And Ewak, coal is actually only responsible for 42% of US energy supply, according to the latest government EIA stats. We need to keep transitioning away from it and toward clean energy.
@thelawisafterme It was Meringue with sprinkles.
sparklesequinsjewels 1 month ago
How high to you have to be to think this makes any sense. Sure, it's funny, but---informative? NO! Logical? NO! Convincing? NO! I guess somebody must have gotten a grant, HUH?
gravelgavel 2 years ago
methane gas ... hmmmm ok i want you to go behind your car, and inhale your exhuast for a few minutes... back yet... o u DIDNT pass out. GOOD - ok
not burn some ethnol...go ahead..ill wait....
still waiting.... ya...im waiting cuz if you inhaled ethenol gas exhaust, youd pass out if you did the same amount of time as a petrol car - learn wtf chemicals do when burned jackass before trying to convince us of bullshit.
fhorn4ever2007 2 years ago
Why don't you go and read about Nuclear Fusion, not the same as fission. This is the same type of power that our sun uses to make so big lights, Guess what it's the same and it lasts for a very, long time. Why don't you and all of the other simple people look beyond your nose. Coal is dirty, fission is dirty. Fusion is the answer. We're close, this is where the money needs to go.The size of a Fusion generator can be small, or big. Google this and read, read, and read some more. Bless you
armedandticklish 2 years ago
Don't waste your time trying to explain science to liberals. Many of these anti-coal activists embrace ethanol (C2H5OH), even though they both produce the same carbon dioxide when burned.
Methane is twenty times as potent of a greenhouse gas as CO2, and both are produced naturally by every animal on the planet.
I wouldn't be surprised if Al Gore is behind this group. Coal is his biggest competitor, and if the "green" companies he owns aren't making money, then Al Gore isn't making money.
Monawanaha 2 years ago
Nuclear energy is the answer to our coal problem. No current energy source provides enough constant power or base power, except nuclear. If Americans could just get past the stigma that comes with nuclear power we'd be much better off.
TheLifeAquatic3 2 years ago
Morons... :-( If you eliminate the coal fire plants on campus they will still get their power/heat from coal, but it will just be generated somewhere else. All you are doing is adding more efficiency drops by adding more steps.
You will pollute more.
Coal is likely the clean option for generating enough heat for an entire campus. Natural gas is probably an option too, but I already pay enough for school without adding that cost.
You should find a solution, and then feel free to bitch.
benjaminlately 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Get rid of those wasteful jobs, We dont need to keep shit jobs like taking care of the elderly. Let them die. We dont need hostess to make more cakes. WE dont need cheetos factories. We dont need soda factories. Now we have enough from alternate energies. Also Nuclear power is great.
heoko 2 years ago
Very well, the Sierra Club doesn't like coal power. How shocking.
The real question then is what will replace coal? Your favorites wind, solar, etc. don't make up enough power to replace what would be lost by eliminating coal. You are against nuclear energy.
It's fine to be against coal but before we start taxing everyone that uses it to death we need a replacement that FULLY makes up for it. This way businesses can still have power and provide jobs.
Gillz17 2 years ago
Love this - very funny. And Ewak, coal is actually only responsible for 42% of US energy supply, according to the latest government EIA stats. We need to keep transitioning away from it and toward clean energy.
velociheather 2 years ago 2