Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Traffic Court Tips : Driving Without a License vs. Suspended License

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
6,238
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
There is no Interactive Transcript.

Uploaded by on Nov 6, 2008

Each state treats driving without a license and driving with a suspended license differently, with the severity of each offense depending on how a person lost driving privileges. Avoid getting in trouble with the law by not driving in either case with advice from a certified civil mediator in this free video on traffic violations.

Expert: Robert M Todd
Bio: Robert Todd is the managing partner and president of Robert M. Todd, P.A. and Family Law Solutions. He is a certified family mediator and Florida Supreme Court certified civil mediator.
Filmmaker: Christopher Rokosz

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • if you are sovereign you don't need a license. Decline all contracts with the courts do not enter into joinder and they have no case. No contract/joinder no case...Period!

  • @m221201r Their are 3 laws,you cant hurt anyone,you cant destroy someones property,and you cant lie to get someones money.other than that,they are statutes.Made to make revene.

see all

All Comments (34)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Big Fat LIE... We all have the right to travel anonymously without ANY Govt issued ID, registration, Ins, etc. Those Items ONLY apply to COMMERCE, conducting business on the road for profit. Traffic laws are ONLY for Commercial vehicles... NOT sovereign free men and women traveling upon the roads. Licensing a right, IS a CRIME, and you have NO DUTY to OBEY criminal acts and they are VOID oin their FACE!

  • @amzuel420 indeed ,you are correct.

  • @justaman6972 If people would watch crap like this and ask themselves, "What is the definition of a crime?" they might realize why these kinds of lawyers are called, "A friend of the court". To qualify as a "crime" the action must involve violating someone's rights. There must be suffering, injury, and or loss. Those elements must be established in order for there to be "a legal cause of action". The judge cannot be representing an interested party. The officer can't be the complainant. (scam?)

  • @m221201r a common law court of record with a sovereign grand jury will present an indictment/charges against another for breaking the common law. So the accused would be answerable to the injured party for common law crimes ,or tortfeasor. I told you that I am not going to give law school lessons. Got to freedom-school dott orgg for some study and to have some questions answered.Peace...

  • @justaman6972 self governance. so when sovereigns kill steal or assault who has authority over them? themselves?

  • @m221201r go define citizen and then define sovereign in a legal dictionary like Black's law. There is no such thing as an American citizen first of all. So know that every word in law has a different meaning than what is spoken in business English. A citizen is a subject/slave,a sovereign is a King or Queen. As sovereign relates to the Constitution it allows for the ownership of private property and to be a King ,or Queen without subjects to rule over,rather you impose self rule,self governance

  • @justaman6972 no because im an ignorant american citizen. As a sovereign you are stating you are not an american citizen? then how can people who are citizens of other countries be held accountable? if you dont want to be subjected to the same guidelines as people who are citizens go start you own country. well give you rhode island...

  • @m221201r its not an opinion it is the LAW. As such a majority rule is not law but a form of govt.called democracy,a terrible form of government. Ben Franklin said of democracy the following: "A democracy is 2 wolves and a sheep voting on dinner. A Constitutional Republic has the same dinner guests, but the sheep has a gun!" A Republican form of govt. does not allow 99% of the population to run roughshod over the rights of 1 %. The way it should be!

  • @m221201r did you not read the comment I made about the common law? It covers murder,battery etc. The misconception is that people call state statutes laws,they are not laws. If you harm another you can be held in criminal and civil suit. However codes,ordinances and statutes do not apply to one who lives and works and declares themselves to be sovereign common law American nationals, not US citizens as the 14th amt defines it.Disagree all you like but back it up with evidence,or case citations

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more