National Press Club Debate Christopher Monckton v Richard Denniss 2011 Address

( http://wakeup2thelies.com ) IN FULL (HD) | National Press Club Debate Address Christopher Monckton v Richard Denniss 2011 Australia ABC 19/July/2011

Lord Christopher Monckton is Chief Policy Advisor to the Science and Public Policy Institute. He was Special Advisor to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher from 1982 to 1986.

Dr Richard Denniss is the Australia Institute's Executive Director. He is an economist with a particular interest in the role of regulation

New my website http://wakeup2thelies.com
Subscribe to my Youtube channel http://bit.ly/mz6xrF
Follow me on twitter http://twitter.com/#!/wakeup2thelies
Follow me on face book http://on.fb.me/jlU314

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• National Press Club Debate
• npc
• National Press Club
• National Press Club address
• debate
• Lord Christopher Monckton

[mattpassive]

I wasn't aware that the sentence "the following article has not undergone any scientific peer review" appearing above Monckton's claimed peer-reviewed paper in fact meant the exact opposite. Thank you for setting me straight, Monckton!

[Sebbb5]

Fraud Bonckton pulled most of his 'facts' out of his butt, as any cursory search of actual science will show. And don't tell me, tell NASA, Scripps Oceanography, NOAA, NAS, NSA, The Pentagon, The US Air Force, IBM, GE, and every publishing climate scientist on earth. And tell the Nobel Physics Prize Committee - when you publish your theories and data as to why all of the above are wrong they would love to give invite you to Stockholm for the Prize. You can take his weirdship with you.

[Atheeizm]

Who is still listening to this hack? It's over. Let it go.

[benaberry]

@mrocean21

Everything he has presented has been proven a false. I am not going to state them here, all you have to do is review the counter arguments which there are plenty off them. He has stated he has written peer review articles, knowing full well people would take that as Peer reviewed, he didn't clarify that deceit until the geek mob questioned him on it, now its, oh it was reviewed by the editor.....please, he is just a politician. He said he advised MT, bull!!

[mrocean21]

@benaberry calling someone a liar does not make them a liar until they are proven guilty by the facts and evidence, items which you have clearly forgotten to think about.

[mrocean21]

@Sebbb5 1) Lord Monckton has mentioned fact after fact in the above 58min video. Try watching again, this time listening with an open mind. 2) If you are against debates, then why did you watch this video or comment on it? Surely if you want to prevent a debate on climate science it means you don't want to hear the other side of things, which is not the way to get the truth. But the IPCC has been proven to have false data (lies), eg Himalayan glaciers. Climategate exposed. These are proven lies.

[Sebbb5]

If you Google parliament uk july letter monckton you will see that the UK government had to publicly slap Bonckton down because he kept lying about his status as a Lord. That he lies about climate change is well known already. And the fact that he deniers won't stop repeating the same non-science doesn't mean there is still a 'debate'.

[jq747]

It's pretty damn scary that climate change science is not decided by actual scientists, but by politicians, economists, bureaucrats and other assorted pencil-necks. That's why we have crippling and retarded policies like: carbon tax in a country which generates less than 0.1% of co2 worldwide; no nuclear policy in a country which exports uranium; and no serious solar projects in the "sunburnt country". God save us from fuckwit politicians.

[IFrancyISantosI]

no applause on the last statement. right way...

CO2 is not a pollutant

[WaxItYourself]

@Atheeizm I know. I usually just come in here to talk to people and create discussion for those that are not posting so they are not swayed by moronic arguments like the ones I was responding to.