Costain - Pioneering Aerial Photography with the sensefly swingletCAM
Loading...
1,862
Loading...
Uploader Comments (KORECGROUP)
see all
All Comments (4)
-
That's the problem. I've looked at UAV's for aerial photography even owned one.
The legal restrictions are such it limits it to flying over fields. Great for crop surveying everything else looks to be illegal. Great little flying machine you have there, I could have a million and one uses for it, if only it was allowed.
-
This is the best approach if you know you can limit to small surfaces like 0.5km2 or so. Beyond that little can be done as the wing design would be heavy and even somewheat dangerous to throw (heavier, larger prop, faster etc).
The other way is just to map the whole square something like 1x1km to 3x3km using Pteryx. Then there are extra benefits like more regular pictures etc because of stabilised head.
Loading...
I can't see how this was a legal flight over a road in use, it might just come within the CAA grey area, but use it anywhere built up and totally illegal, use above 400 feet totally illegal, take off within 50 meters of a person or building or vehicle totally illegal, fly it commercially without the proper CAA approved training totally illegal.
Treewithoutabird 3 months ago
@Treewithoutabird Thanks for the comments.You’re correct, flying above 400ft is illegal, flying over a motorway also illegal, taking off within 50 metres of another person or building totally illegal. Given this, we ensured that we flew within these regulations and didn’t fly over the motorway or launch within 50 metres from anyone else during take-off. Plus we also have the correct training from EuroUSC, a CAA approved Accreditation Specialist for assessing Airworthiness & Pilot Qualifications.
KORECGROUP 3 months ago