Of course he wouldn't allow this video response to be posted on his original video: primitive minds still believe censorship is a valid form of argument.
@BjornSeverinLarsen You say that christianity has created sciences (I agree) and is still carrying it today (I don't agree). A biblical science that aren't allowed to follow the evidence to the conclusion which is the most rational based on the evidence isn't science. If you have your bible with all it's knowledge, then to have to conform your evidence to the bible - this is not science. However christian scientists doesn't do this, they do science. Thus making them scientists, not christians
@TruthIsLife7 I actually misunderstood biogenesis, I thought you meant abiogenesis in my last comment. What I meant was, the evidence seem to point towards abiogenesis being possible, however not yet proving it. Pasteur said: "Spontaneous generation is a dream", which is true to a point. Newton also believed in alkymi. All Pasteur could empirically show was the generation of life from life - this is something that abiogenesis potenially can disproove.It hasn't yet, but it might.
@TruthIsLife7 Biogenesis is not any kind of hypothesis. It's one of the strongest laws of science that exists. Very little in all science has more evidence than biogenesis.
@BjornSeverinLarsen Hey Bjorn...long time no chat...sorry for my terrible delay..I've had extremely busy months and many deadlines...but soon will send you the e-mail I promised. Modern science wouldn't exist without many biblical principles and the Christians who followed them&science STILL follows biblical concepts and has confirmed many scientific claims in the Bible.Everyone was Hindu, Buddhist, Zeusian in other parts of the world, yet they didn't invent modern science.
@TruthIsLife7 Even if science rests on the shoulders of chrsitians and the bible, it doesn't anymore. Since apparently biogenesis is the theory with the least amount of evidence - what are the theory with the most and what are the evidence? Biogenesis is still an unprooven hypothesis. However the evidence keep backing up the hypothesis. About christians building science, yes ofcourse they did. Everyone was christian back then - if they had claimed not to be, bad things would have happend to them
@TruthIsLife7 Answer the man, do you really think anyone believes you're a professor when you can't even understand Pasteur's work from over a century ago?
@TruthIsLife7 Why not just come clean about the whole 'professor' lie? I mean you can't even comprehend that Pasteur's work had nothing to do with the biochemical origin of life, do you really think anyone is going to believe you're a professor?
@BjornSeverinLarsen You say that christianity has created sciences (I agree) and is still carrying it today (I don't agree). A biblical science that aren't allowed to follow the evidence to the conclusion which is the most rational based on the evidence isn't science. If you have your bible with all it's knowledge, then to have to conform your evidence to the bible - this is not science. However christian scientists doesn't do this, they do science. Thus making them scientists, not christians
BjornSeverinLarsen 4 weeks ago
@TruthIsLife7 I actually misunderstood biogenesis, I thought you meant abiogenesis in my last comment. What I meant was, the evidence seem to point towards abiogenesis being possible, however not yet proving it. Pasteur said: "Spontaneous generation is a dream", which is true to a point. Newton also believed in alkymi. All Pasteur could empirically show was the generation of life from life - this is something that abiogenesis potenially can disproove.It hasn't yet, but it might.
BjornSeverinLarsen 4 weeks ago
@TruthIsLife7 Biogenesis is not any kind of hypothesis. It's one of the strongest laws of science that exists. Very little in all science has more evidence than biogenesis.
TruthIsLife7 4 weeks ago
@BjornSeverinLarsen Hey Bjorn...long time no chat...sorry for my terrible delay..I've had extremely busy months and many deadlines...but soon will send you the e-mail I promised. Modern science wouldn't exist without many biblical principles and the Christians who followed them&science STILL follows biblical concepts and has confirmed many scientific claims in the Bible.Everyone was Hindu, Buddhist, Zeusian in other parts of the world, yet they didn't invent modern science.
TruthIsLife7 4 weeks ago
@TruthIsLife7 Even if science rests on the shoulders of chrsitians and the bible, it doesn't anymore. Since apparently biogenesis is the theory with the least amount of evidence - what are the theory with the most and what are the evidence? Biogenesis is still an unprooven hypothesis. However the evidence keep backing up the hypothesis. About christians building science, yes ofcourse they did. Everyone was christian back then - if they had claimed not to be, bad things would have happend to them
BjornSeverinLarsen 4 weeks ago
@TruthIsLife7 Answer the man, do you really think anyone believes you're a professor when you can't even understand Pasteur's work from over a century ago?
PhantomOfChaosSkin 2 months ago
great video.. but im pretty sure croatia is not an island :)
squizill 4 months ago in playlist More videos from DonExodus2
Yup, Mr venom be a dummby:
sstan1337 4 months ago 2
@TruthIsLife7 Why not just come clean about the whole 'professor' lie? I mean you can't even comprehend that Pasteur's work had nothing to do with the biochemical origin of life, do you really think anyone is going to believe you're a professor?
CreationistsLOST 5 months ago