Turbo Geo Metro vs 5.0 Mustang

Turbo Geo Metro vs a 94 5.0 Mustang. The Geo started to lean out badly just before the 1/8th, so i got way out of it. I wound up running a 16.3@73 with a 2.2 60ft, while the Mustang ran a 15.8 @ 89. Had i not leaned out i probably would have ran a 15.5 or better at 87+.

*I forgot to mention that my stock clutch was slipping ALL of 2nd gear!*

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• Geo
• Metro
• Turbo
• 5.0
• Mustang
• Swift
• 1.0
• Firefly
• Mitsubishi
• MMP
• Montgomery

[SSshane6d9]

I think you forgot the 1 in front of the 7 the first time around haha. It's not a 7 sec ride, youve got a 17sec ride, even though it is a 5 speed hahaha. By the way here's a tip. At night your ride's gonna be slower then during the day, less traction due to the strip cooling down, if you woulda said ALL DAY LONG, i'd give you a 16.8 @89 mph maybe lol. But since you said ALL NIGHT LONG. Gotta give the the 17

[tchdwnuga]

I have no idea what you're talking about. Do you even speak english, because what you typed makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

[jmoyet]

whats the HP on that metro?

[tchdwnuga]

Right around 100whp on 7psi.

1.0 3 cylinder

Look at my other video at the dragstrip for a full mod list.

[x1boomer]

@gdog5 i think he is a chevy guy since he has SS on his name. nice car and if you lose a race, o'well its a geo metro. if you win however, the other guy must feel like dirt bc he got beat by a geo metro. if you start at the bottom you can only move up and put people to shame. dont let the trolls put u down.

[kyles92z34]

@bikr1975

Depends on your definition of "hauls ass". This car was most definately wide open. 100whp in a 1600lb car is a pretty good power/weight ratio.

If you figure that the Mustang was probably in the neighborhood of 190ish-whp(94s only had 215hp at the crank) in a 3400lb car: That's roughly a 17/1 p/w ration. While the Geo is sitting at about 16/1. Would be a good race on paper. This vid backs that up.

[bikr1975]

hahahaha....i dont think the guy with the mustang was even trying unless they put a tiny 1.5 liter shit motor in it!! my buddy has a stock 92 stang with only 225 hp and still hauls ass to this very day. but if we are seeing a metro beating the stang??.....then, its gotta be making way more than just 100hp! i do know however, spark plug non-foulers work with the exhaust system o2 sensors to lean out fuel mixture giving you an extra punch for a short time. long intervals will cause overheating.

[edawg305]

how did a 5.0 mustang run a 15.8 at 89 mph? lmao

[ccbarnes1000]

@normanaw yes it is

[ccbarnes1000]

@normanaw it wil outrun your

[ccbarnes1000]

@normanaw dont be mad because u cant buy a mustang

[GMCman82]

@normanaw i call them ford muffstain , mainly because women drive em. they are rapidly turnin into a chicks car.

[normanaw]

@ccbarnes1000 it just did, and frankly it isnt very hard to outrun a rustang

[coldblue29]

I personally owned a geo metro 3 cylinder for like 6 years. The very best car I have EVER owned tbh. Tank and metro are synonomous in my personal opinion. And yes they are very slow stock, but they are also extremely easy to work on. They are extremely reliable too. If you have an oppotunity to nab a geo, i'd say take it or u r a stupid fuck.@motorchad, yes some metros came with 4 bangers.some with turbo. google suzuki swift.