jumpingnaudet - higher resolution

I say the explosion in the first hit footage is real and captured on the morning of 9-11-2001.

Layering a "wingmark" to suffice before the laser slash wingmark was applied does not render the footage itself fake.
Decimating frames to make the thing-in-the-air sequence faster does not make it "fake."

The second hit is geopositioned virtual world spiced up with real time video from the same pre-planned angles. The cartoon planes are added by TV Fakery processes. We have shown that the Spiderman movie had an entire "virtual" New York at it's disposal.
There is video in Relics in the Rubble of a scientist who spent seven years building a virtual New York
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8373623103335330859

But that is all the second hit.

Instead of some flat colored hippityhopper mangled "plane" with parts missing and not enough frames, every frame and every field of the record of the first hit is unique and features subtle differentiations.
http://missilegate.com/blob11
http://missilegate.com
http://webfairy.org/flyingpig

In the first hit they are showing us the actual processes by which they created both plane shape holes.
The background shadows are particular to a sunny morning in September, before 9:00 AM, at this particular actual physical location.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVy7LJj-BUk

There is some strange round thing sticking out a window and making flashes while the explosions are exploding.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0I3uDMwvHdc

The footage has been "monkeycammed", but that does not turn it into "fake."
It has suffered postprocessing to obscure evidence: the footage is decimated to the point the pre-explosion building front has no continuity left.

Missing frames do not make the remaining frames "fake."

Kept in it's own context, I honor the groundbreaking work of Simon, Fred and Ozzy. They have established the weaponization of television as a component of the Joint Military Objective Force Future Combat System.

The Future Combat System has 18 tentacles, and the TV Fakery application that created the second hit cartoons is just one of them.

Tiny maneuverable uav drones are another Future Combat Systems project.
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22future+combat+system%22+uav
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22future+combat+system%22+drone

http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=1975&view=findpost&p...

Category:

Education

Tags:

• WTC First Hit
• Webfairy
• Naudet
• wq2rx

[freedomfan0801]

i'm not a believer of all this no plane shit but this video kind of stumps me. I can't explain the shaking shadow parts of that building.

The part about the Steadycam is false. It is a hand cam. They are not using a steadycam. As you can see the camera is shaking when they are filming the fireman playing around way before they pan left for the plane hit. And of course it is going to start shaking wildly. Could you hold it steady after seeing what just happened?

[webfairy911]

It's a steadycam. The footage of the firemen is steady while they're hanging around. The pan across the ATT building is incredibly smooth. As soon as the evidence in the explosions gets interesting, the footage starts dancing around, yet it isn't "real" jerky camera motion. It's monkeycamming.

[Xenomorph911WTC]

This video is bogus, it's an artifact caused by the deashaker filter in Virtualdub.

[webfairy911]

The flaw is there. It's visable once the footage is deinterlaced, and maybe before. It seems to just affect the shadowed parts, but there's some round thing that's not there in the "setup shot" in those shadows too.

[Ehrenmann007]

Could You please point out the dust clouds at the top of the north tower.

[Ehrenmann007]

Could You please point out the detonation flashes in both towers rigt after the so called impact?

[LithuanianGuitar]

Could this be only a compression artifact? If it's not a compression artifact, please explain why.

[paqman87]

i cant understand the point about those flashes on the building, someone can explain what does it mean? please

[skinengine]

I do like the blues riff in the background!

[skinengine]

I held my finger on one spot, during the wild camera shaking part. I saw a layered rectangle moving wildly, not the objects in the video. The fireman touches his hat to hold it on his head while turning around to look up. They do weigh quite a few pounds. Across the street, the fire cheif's car, and the firetruck have thier lightbar flashing. He has been called to test something in that drain grate. That is some kind of testing device.

[alawson911]

Why don't you play around with the Pope's next mass audience, in St. Peter's Square, and prove that he doesn't really appear on the balcony, because he's been dead for two years?

This video is meaningless.

[911conspiracyTV]

...trying to obscure something flying around that's not a bird.

Interesting.

[EvilUSAandthe911Lie]

I believe there's a short interview with him in the movie. I think he's the firefighter who says, "I knew at that very moment it was going to be a long day."

His comments seem so well scripted and over-dramatic. You know, how these perps always come across as being so "deeply moved" by everything that happened on 9/11.

They're so deeply moved, yet they never bother to investigate a damn thing. lol!

[babywithanailgun]

Bravo. That is an excellent description of that very odd looking gesture. Two fingers tap the hat and "action!". I noticed he looks directly into the camera right before too. I wonder how he was getting his own cues. Have these "firemen" been identified?