Responding to comments for The Limitations of Science and "Scientism"

Responding to comments for my video titled "The Limitations of Science and "Scientism"

I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use. - Galileo

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• The
• Limitations
• of
• Science
• and
• Scientism

[gotafakename]

@camilo101 unfortunately there is no evidence for god, evidence has to be observable, repeatable, and not based entirely 100% in feeling. now that is not to say that god does not exist, but you cant make claims like that when you cant back them up. you cant prove god's existence anymore than you can disprove it, the only thing you can do is believe or not believe.

[camilo101]

@TheAssesKicker Venom gives plenty of evidence in his vids, I'm guessing you only click on them to troll not watch. We have evidence for God, but you refuse to accept it. However you don't have evidence that God does not exist, you have nothing but a negative, maybe that is why Atheists are so negative? As for the dog, there is no evidence for it knowing English, but we have evidence that dogs are incapable of speaking man's languages, however they do have some intelligence and can be dyed pink.

[SqueakerAlpha]

@camilo101 please present your evidence for Santas non-existance ? I will point out that Norad tracks his progress over the USA each year.

[WynnterReverie]

Aw. :( I remember when I used to follow this guy's videos during that whole period of time when I doubted back when I was still a Christian. And I relied so heavily on what he was saying and wanted so desperately to believe. And I realize now that this was actually what made me stop believing. That religion can take over you and you will not question it. You'll waste time debating how life was created and forget to actually live. :/

[TheAssesKicker]

@camilo101 Also, could you please prove to me that my pink intelligent dog that speaks in English doesn't exists? You can't? Does that mean you have to be skeptical about it? No, if you are, then you are either mentally challenged or very delusional.

[TheAssesKicker]

@camilo101 Which is exactly the point. Just imagine the following: You claimed that god exists, i told you to provide some evidence, you didn't provide any, so i simply didn't believe in him. You're the one who should prove it because you're the one making that claim. i can't disprove a negative.

[camilo101]

@TheAssesKicker If you're going to make the claim that God doesn't exist, you need evidence to support that claim. Making an argument solely on lack of evidence from the other side is not an argument. The reason we don't believe in Santa is not due to a lack of evidence for his existence, it's because we have evidence that Santa does not exist. This is the flaw of Atheism, they can't provide evidence against God's existence, all they can do is say there is a lack of evidence for his existence.

[TheAssesKicker]

@Triipticz Yes, you can.

[Triipticz]

@TheAssesKicker Yes you can make the assumption that something is true based on surveys or what not pointing towards a certain "fact." However, you cannot assume something is not true due to the lack of evidence supporting its existence.