Eddie Izzard talks about chiropractors
Top Comments
All Comments (249)
-
@TheJudoKevin Check out Wikipedia, it's as good a source as I'm ever likely to have access to. The studies are conflicting but not condemnatory or enough to make it a subject of ridicule.
-
@squamish4244 Did you ever get those studies? I would be curious to see them. Please forward them.
-
is it me or are all the comments under this one people arguing with each other?
-
@TerrySleeper - your confused about definitions.
A substance is not an act.
Suggested reading: "Francis J.H. Wilson (ed.), Chiropractic In Europe - An Illustrated History" (Leicester, 2007). Lots of pictures and not too taxing for the layman.
-
@yunged Not entirely true... There are many scientific bodies of work, in multiple professional journals that legitimizes many Chiropractic practices. The general public also must realize that the educational breath and depth has changed significantly over the years (within the U.S.). Most modern day Chiropractic Physicians do not practice as a subluxation theorist, and are taught to be general primary care practitioners. The physical manipulations are effective i treating many...
-
@chadhedges What education could you possibly need? the entire field of biology and medicine tells us that chiropody makes no sense!
-
@TerrySleeper and you can't see how a physical act could work as a placebo? really?
-
@yunged I did say that. Chiro works. You want studies, I'll get them.
-
@yunged - placebo - " a substance having no pharmacological effect but given merely to satisfy a patient who supposes it to be a medicine."
No "substance" is nvolved here.
"Make the noise, make the noise! I LIVE FOR THE NOISE!"
Lmao he kinda sounded like Black Adder when he said "So whats this for?" "I have no idea... *fling!*"
nightstarwolf11 1 year ago 40
....and then at the end your back pain, headaches, sciatica, numb fingers, and vertigo are gone!!
9pt9 1 year ago 26