Global Warming: katavideo concedes to JeremyOyer1

katavideo has conceded, she has no definitive proof of anthropogenic global warming.

Arctic ice was significantly reduced or MIA before the automobile

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/29/usgs-arctic-sea-too-warm-for-sea-ice-3-...

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/09/10/study-arctic-was-5c-warmer-during-the-l...

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/09/08/inconvenient-ice-study-less-ice-in-the-...

http://www.c3headlines.com/2010/10/russian-arctic-experts-the-arctic-has-ente...

http://web.archive.org/web/20080425152058/http://chubasco.fis.ucm.es/~montoya...

Central Asia was warmer during the Medieval Warm Period, yet CO2 levels were lower

http://www.c3headlines.com/2010/07/global-warming-alarmists-take-another-hit-...

The climate change/global warming consensus debunked

http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&Cont...

http://coast.gkss.de/staff/storch/pdf/GKSS_2010_9.CLISCI.pdf

http://www.c3headlines.com/2010/09/climate-science-disruption-climate-scienti...

Greenland was warmer during the Medieval Warm Period

http://www.c3headlines.com/2010/09/west-arctic-peer-confirms-greenland-data-t...

Southwest US has not significantly warmed over the last decade

http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2010/10/18/just-making-it-up-as-they-go-al...

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• anthropogenic
• global
• warming
• Al
• Gore
• James
• Hansen
• Medieval
• Warm
• Period
• mccainisthrough
• mccainisthrough1
• janitor
• from
• chicago
• katavideo
• concedes
• to
• jeremyoyer1
• jeremy
• oyer
• professor
• enigma
• utubekookdetector
• arctic
• ice
• melting
• Greenland
• climate
• change
• Marc
• Morano
• Reese
• Halter
• Steven
• Goddard
• Joe
• Romm
• Anthony
• Watts

[UTubekookdetector]

ECP: You originally claimed (and of course, only allowed scientists who get public funding) that there was a consensus in the climate change/global warming debate. That is demonstratably false. I should also mention that this kid was so wound up, his opening comment on this vid stated that I said climatologists can't ascertain previous climate change. If he had actually listened to the vid, he would know do NOT hold such a view. IPCC admits we don't understand climate forcings.

[TheEclipsenow]

@UTubekookdetector So according to your own words we can't trust government funded scientists. Tell me, are cancer researches corrupt if they take public funding? What about astronauts and cosmologist and astronomers and health experts and outbreak monitors? They're all corrupt, they're all in on the "Area 51" conspiracy! ;-)

In summary, we KNOW what absorption spectra Co2 operates on by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. This is repeatable, demonstrable physics. Deny that you fool.

[UTubekookdetector]

ECP: HAHA, you're mad. For those who are wondering, ECP used the "consensus" argument on a few other vids of mine & I referred him to this one. Check the links under "the climate change/global warming consensus debunked." You mean we had extinction events before Wal-Mart & the Malthusians were wringing their hands over extinction events back in the 70s that never happened? "peanut oil" Are we projecting? May I recommend a trip to the doctor?

[TheEclipsenow]

@UTubekookdetector Wow, your powers o comprehension are quite retarded aren't they? I'm talking about documented extinction events 55 million years ago and hundreds of millions of years ago. Not the 1970's, capiche? You're the one that's all over the map. When you're quite done rubbing yourself in peanut butter and screaming at the walls, we might actually have a conversation on the actual topic, OK? Nutter.

[UTubekookdetector]

ECP: So are you dropping your silly contention that I was saying climatologists don't know climate in the past? I wasnt implying anything, you're attacking a straw man. See the IPCC link I provided you with and look up "solar irradiance." "dieoff events" I remember some of your envirokook buddies predict massive species extinctions back in the 70s, didn't happen. You're getting pretty desperate ECP, you're all over the map making a serious of generalized arguments.

[TheEclipsenow]

@UTubekookdetector You tried to imply that it was warmer in the past as if the climatologists don't know this and hey, what's the big deal, it was warmer in the past therefore everything will be OK if it gets warmer now, right? Newsflash: super-greenhouses in the past resulted in annoxic oceans, dieoff events, and here's another nasty little FACT — the sun is 2% hotter today than back when the dinosaurs ran under a super-greenhouse sky. It will be WORSE this time!

[UTubekookdetector]

This user ECP was peddling the "consensus" myth and I referenced this vid for him. See the links underneath "the climate change/global warming consensus debunked." He likes using the fallacious consensus argument, perferring scientists who are funded with federal tax dollars.

[UTubekookdetector]

ECP: You mad? I never said Climatologists don't use proxies to determine climate from the past. At what part of the vid did I supposedly say this? I actually went over climate change from thousands of years ago in the vid. I think you're confused or just so flustered you're about to blow a gasket. Actually, even the guys at the IPCC realize they have a poor understanding of climate forcings. ipcc(dot)ch/publicans_and_data­/ar4/wg1/en/ch2s2-9-1(dot)html

[TheEclipsenow]

You're 'debunking' a strawman! And you rave incoherently and don't back up your paranoid assertions! Here's your ABSOLUTELY RETARDED LIE: "CLIMATOLOGISTS DON'T KNOW ABOUT PREVIOUS CLIMATE CHANGE". That's the worst piece of Denialist crap I've ever heard. Ever read about Milankovitch cycles, continental drift, super-volcanoes that blot out the sun, or high volcanism that raises methane and Co2 levels? Why was the climate hotter for the dinosaurs than today? Hmmm? Climatologists can tell you!

[UTubekookdetector]

DRK doesn't pay attention very well (see the archives): When I referenced the 1958-78 period, I was referring to N. Hemisphere temperatures. The 1970 period to the present was referring to Antarctic sea ice, ice overall on the continent and continental temperatures (I also gave several references in connection with that). He either doesn't pay attention very well or he's butchering my comments in an effort to gain the upper-hand. See the archives folks!