Crash test of a F-4 Phantom
Loading...
Loading...
22,105
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 1:40F-4 Phantom Crashby neffwaffe31,866 views
Featured Video
- 2:23F-4 crash MUST SEEby hornitpilot24,319 views
- 0:23F-4 crashby wingman01111110,753 views
- 6:57Crash test of a F-4 Phantomby unviaggiatore148,326 views
- 0:30F4 Phantom crash testby kblomquist16,010 views
- 0:37f-4 test crashby shortyspunx42,247 views
- 0:23F-4 Phantom Stall & Crashby ouroboris31,607 views
- 2:10Scramble Phantom F-4Dby slivers4914,692 views
- 0:28Crash Test Dummies Plane Crash - eerieby Maverickenstein42,862 views
- 5:40SMART car crash (TEST)by Edvardas961,238,281 views
- 8:36WTC: Can 767 Aluminum Wing Cut 14'Steel? Crash ...by prophecy202019,876 views
- 3:31Iranian Fighter Plane Crashby riyadh34133,040 views
- 0:51F-4 Phantom Testby chung1shen44,688 views
- 5:15F-4 Phantom - Luftwaffeby zimolaviation75,739 views
- 1:38Dogfights F4 Phantom IIby myxmatari267,951 views
- 1:22DC7 Crash Testby x2501x121,371 views
- 0:36F-4 Phantom vs Nuclear Powerplant Wallby 04famine889,969 views
- 9:38German Air Force / F-4 Phantom Luftwaffeby nasenstaub28,243 views
- 0:58F-4 Phantom Departure Vietnam DaNang Air Baseby aviationvidsDOTcom17,443 views
- 4:282002 Pt Mugu Airshow F4 Phantom Crashby craigstrom432,509 views
however once building 7 had it's sudden onset of collapse, that's right around free fall. don't give me the bogus count from when a few things on the roof started to collapse. i'm talking when the whole roof started to collapse to the time it reached the ground was around 6.4 seconds if i recall correctly. do the math on that.
Thrashaero 1 year ago
@mourantell that's nice, because i didn't say they fell at free fall speed, i'm saying they would amount to free fall had the building beneath the collapse provide no resistance, which apparently it wasn't providing hardly much at all given the constant rate of collapse despite the 'piledriver' force people always refer to was spilling out the sides...there was not enough energy regardless of speed to have crushed the rest of the building without a piledriver force.
Thrashaero 1 year ago
@Thrashaero watch?v=qLShZOvxVe4 Do the math, they weren't collapsing at a free fall speed.
mourantell 1 year ago
@JohnEdwardIAF
what's so hard to understand? the absolute fucking lack of physics!
you can put in caps tons and use big numbers all you want. the numbers of the building's engineering as a whole, for one doesn't allow it to commence collapse quite as suddenly, nor as quickly, regardless how they engineered it for the latter. there was indeed something to slow it down...building beneath. otherwise you're talking a free fall. the kinetic energy in the falling part was bleeding off. no piledriver
Thrashaero 1 year ago
@Thrashaero
"ever heard of a building totally obliterating itself in less than 15 seconds?"
What's so hard to understand about a buidling crushing itself? It had a mass of 100,000's of TONS. Once the top portion of the structure began to move, there was no stopping it, or slowing it down.
"ever heard of the fact the building was designed to withstand FULLY LOADED 707's going FASTER than the 767's did? "
Yeah, and the titanic was 'unsinkable' LMAO. NONSENSE
JohnEdwardIAF 1 year ago
This ladies and gentleman is why Greenpeace is full of shit with their fear mongering about plane attacks against nuclear reactors.
Concrete slab wins!
TheFluffyDuck 2 years ago
It was a wall test, dummy.
Do you really think they would learn anything about an old plane.
gregrutz 2 years ago
your mom's an asshole...that i ripped up last night
atticusgru 3 years ago
What's the point in all that, why would they have needed the planes to crash as a coverup when they could have said that terrorists blew up WTC (taking out 1 floor along with support structures would have been enough)
Wisestofall 3 years ago
If you want, acept my video response it's another QPhantom Crash
JSF122386 4 years ago