Robert Greenwald discusses Stop the Kennedy Smears on MSNBC
Top Comments
All Comments (49)
-
Fascist Democrats hate free speech. These are the same liberals who advocated killing the Danish cartoonists.
-
@klard I just finished watching the show. It was great, it in no way makes Kennedy look bad, sure it shows how morally corrupt Kennedy was but it also shows how amazing of a President he really was. Im very liberal, and I enjoyed the show.
-
@Strutinan lol everybody calm down, I actually got more info on this and apparently this documentary is full of holes....Stuff like "this person was there at that time" when she was documented as being somewhere else.
I was commenting on the level of information he was dealing with, and our ability to be critical of that information. I.e. if a historian comes and tells me something about another historian's theory, how am i to have an opinion on all of it? I say to Robert, get the infodiscred.
-
YEAH! Its like with cigarettes and cancer, there are DOCTORS (paid by the tobacco companies) that say the two things have nothing to do with each-other, and despite the OTHER 99.9999% of so-called doctors (with jobs at shitholes like Johns Hopkins) saying they ARE related...I CHOOSE to BELIEVE what my reich-wingnut propagandist tells me! After all, propaganda NEVER hurt ANYBODY!
/sarcasm, you fuckwit Faux Noise addicted shill
-
I told Jack 49 years ago to keep his cock under wraps..The cunt had a worldly erection...........Kennedy had a workable hard on...
-
Now, if you compare this interview to the one done on CNN, the one on CNN was able to be bipartisan, and to be able to look at both sides, further proving that CNN is not liberal.
Now, I'm not saying MSNBC is bad, because in reality, they get their facts straight, and they express their liberal opinions while backing up the facts, unlike FOX "News." I just find it rather interesting that people still attack CNN.
Also, stop the Kennedy smears!
-
stop the smears
-
@nilbud im pointing out that his criticisms are on a differently analytical level than the documentation they offer...hence its invalid for us. See you cant say " i dont believe this " when your reading a scientific study...unless you attack it qualitatively . So you could say stuff like " well the pop. is insufficient, you cant generalize, correlation does not mean causation, the authors are stretching their conclusions" etc etc...
But you cant argue with us and prove your point, go to them
-
I think he would have been (perhaps was) the best president usa had.
Kennedy is by far the most intelligent President we have had since Abraham Lincoln. These producers make the mistake of assuming he has the intelligence of George W. Bush. Kennedy would not talk like that trashy fool Bush.
klard 1 year ago 4
Republicans ALWAYS have to try to rewrite history to build up their failed presidents. The last good Republican president was Eisenhower and before that you had to go all the way back to Teddy Roosevelt. Rather than run good men for public office, the GOP tears down the good Democrat presidents.
exenrontexas 1 year ago 3