Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

8 Intel cores faster than 16 AMD cores!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
543,593
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 22, 2007

At the Microprocessor Forum, Intel demoed its V8 workstation running the POV-Ray benchmark. The machine is equipped with Intel's Workstation Board S5000XVN, 2 quad-core Xeons 5365, clocked at 3GHz and 16GB RAM. And the results are simply impressive: Intel scored over 4,900 pixels per seconds versus a little bit over 4,000 for AMD's 4 sockets quad-core (Barcelona) system. Again, this is an AMD 16 cores system versus Intel's 8 cores V8 machine.


"Why do you need 16 cores, when you can do better with 8. Our 8 core system is 30% faster than the 16 core machine AMD showed to the press yesterday. I just don't understand how they can claim to be 40% faster", said Francois Piednoel, an Intel engineer present at the show.
Well, now AMD has some explanation to do and sooner rather than later. Because if they can't figure out what happened with those POV-Ray results they showed us, that's the end of it. At the show, Intel also demoed a system with a 45nm Penryn quad-core processor (shipping by year end) that is 40% faster than the current quad-core generation. Wow!

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1,076 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • 8 Intel Cores = $16000000000000000000000000000­000000000

    160000000000000000000000000000­00000000 Amd Cores = $8 LOL

  • shut up!! those processor are made in my country Malaysia

see all

All Comments (2,288)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @TheGenesisfreak LMAO. pretty accurate

  • The Intel is running 3.0 GHz. Let's clock it down to 2.1Ghz, like the AMD's are. And also, use some high threaded software what actually uses 16 cores or more.

  • @TheWickedsickness

    lol

    ever heard of sandy bridge?

    or westmere?

    or nehalem?

    or clarkdale?

    guess not. Those chips have been MUCH faster clock per clock than anything AMD since nehalem released in 2008.

  • @TheWickedsickness thats right AMD pisses over gay intel

  • lol thats funny, what are they testing video conversion or something i only have 4 cores and hd 5 series it takes under 10 minutes to do a full dvd conversion and under 1 minute for dvd to xvid conversions

    Alot of these gatherings people will purposely slow down competitors systems and say theres is faster, AMD owns intel i dont care what video u make

  • @Taxemicshadow mhm... no there are sooooo many things. Like processing speed. Register size and then RAM, HDD, GPU etc. Pipeline, Data Bandwith :/

    I certainly HATE the marketing!!! Always its made with the Ghz! (The same with Graphics card where all companys give their low end 20$ cards 2GB video ram...)

    If it would be true, my GTX 570 with only 1,25GB of RAM would be slower than some of the shitty laptop graphics with 2GB :D

    Today you really should check benches etc. :)

  • @YourComputerExpert i find you nonsene and naive nature to be amusing ;)

  • @MrGermanBratwurst but do those extra flops even it out at least?

  • @mcdus78 that was 10 years ago you made it in Philippines in your bamboo labs.

  • @MarlboroClassic Wrong! Its made here in the Philippines you lousy Malay!

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more