Global Warming Panel w/the Internet Skeptic pt 1

A Panel of Public Access Producers and guests from past shows have an opportunity to ask the Internet Skeptic about Global Warming and whether false science is merely a product of looking at it dualistically or whether we are standing on the brink of a policy that will lead to genocide. Cited by Paula Gloria from Webster Tarpley's unauthorized biography of George Bush Sr. (who supported population control) the fact of a Eugenics meeting right here in NYC at the American Museum of Natural History in 1932. As Bob Wagoner (the Internet Skeptic) reminds us Bismark was replaced by Hitler and Lenin by Stalin AFTER population control measures were accepted by the people.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• internet
• skeptic
• genocide
• global
• warming

[ShimaUta86]

I thought this was a SNL skit.

[paulagloria]

what's SNL?

[sammyboy211v]

Paula!

Where is "The Internet Skeptic" ? Have not seen any new vids from him in a long time and many of his old ones are removed. Even his website is gone.

Is he no more a skeptic?

[paulagloria]

his boss made him take the vids down...boo hoo

[eweykidd13d]

This vid is popular on Macedonia

[sulfurousstench]

whatever anyone believes, clearcuts are real. total environmental devastation is real. the scientists are paid off by industry to say one thing today & the opposite tomorrow until no one listens to facts anymore... almost all the large fish in the ocean are gone. the entire food chain, the ionosphere and the oceans and every inch of land are being wrecked by the madness of the dominant mindset and endlessly insatiable greed of the CEOs and other mass murderers . We all must resist or die...

[ConservativeCavalry]

@StrawmanLogic, everything you say it true. With the release of the HadleyCRU e-mails, it looks like I was right. Your problem is how can someone like me that you identify as being "unqualified" been able to catch this hoax that the rest of the world didn't? Either you are gullible as hell, or I am a lot more qualified than you imply. Bottom line, I was right and you were wrong, so I get to laugh last, and loudest.

[weatherguy24]

Yes, his arguments and supposed "smoking guns" are utterly ridiculous. He's obviously not a scientist.  He just offers the same old diatribe of BS that deniers love to dish out.

[StrawmanLogic]

EXPERT? PANEL: The Skeptic teaches business classes at Devry. Now he's on the Internet giving his opinion on an area of science for which he holds no degrees nor has he published any peer-reviewed papers. He also ran for congress in Ohio. How did that work out?

[BlackfyreRoy]

DIE!