Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Studying Atheism for Christians part 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
278 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 10, 2009

This video is for Christian who want to answer to Atheism

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 30 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (MrClownpirate)

  • No, what he said is that there absolutely no evidence that god has ever regrown an amputated limb. Do you have any evidence that god has ever done it? Your fallacy is that you can't explain why god supposedly heals all kinds of mundane sicknesses, finds jobs for the unemployed, cures cancer ,yet has never restored an amputee. Find one case in the last hundred years!

  • @JonKevinCherry I am sorry but I dealt with similar questions in the comments with other people and

    I don't feel like going through this again. I made this video about a year ago. I am no longer

    interested in talking with atheists. No offense, I suggest you go to venomfang X's channel. Thanks

    for you comment however.

Top Comments

  • I suspect that you were not an A-student in high school.

  • I never disable comments, cussing or no. Everyone has the right to say whatever they want whenever they want, and express their opinion.

    Please don't be like all the other Christians on YouTube (it seems) and disable the ratings and comments, no matter what.

see all

All Comments (38)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I've never seen a video with no likes before.

  • As soon as you said you were a young earth creationist then i realised that you must have no understanding of the "science degree" that you were awarded with. you are right in that having a piece of paper does not make you smart. fundamentalist christians like yourself are making life for us normal christians a living hell. give us a break, put the bible aside and go and feed some poor people in africa.

  • I can't be bothered watching all of this as you've shown you have no idea what you are talking about.

    So all, literally every single piece of evidence, points to god does NOT heal amputees, yet you're saying that it's an assumption god does not heal amputees? No. No it's not an assumption, all the evidence points to no amputees have been healed. A ridiculous amount of evidence points to no amputees have been healed.

  • Wow, not a single thumbs up.

    So, after seeing the entire video, I notice that the question isn't a loaded question, as evidence leads us to believe the premise thus far. The original video maker didn't make an assertion without evidence towards the assertion being rather apparent to anyone.

    Not a single false premise has been demonstrated. Though it'd be convenient for you to think that.

    Unfortunately, as it stands, you've commited the fallacist's fallacy.

  • No, what he said is that there absolutely no evidence that god has ever regrown an amputated limb. Do you have any evidence that god has ever done it? Your fallacy is that you can't explain why god supposedly heals all kinds of mundane sicknesses, finds jobs for the unemployed, cures cancer ,yet has never restored an amputee., then tell us how glorious your sky spirit is. Find one case in the last hundred years

  • @MobileThinker, Oh and lastly, have a great Thanksgiving week and weekend.

  • @MobileThinker, Now you stated "Think about that for a minute and it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever" actually I know about this and thought about longer than you have. It makes complete sense to God and may never make complete sense to man but that does not affect truth in any shape. Truth is truth whether or not if it make sense to us finite humans.So, in summary, All of God's attributes are impossible for man to comprehend completely. Thanks you Mobile for your questions.

  • @MobileThinker Its Thanksgiving and now I have time to respond to some people.Now, you stated "should it not also apply to your original father?" No, the passages states the sins from your father singular not father(s) plural, meaning fathers in the past. Adam is your covenant headship and your Daddy is not therefor there is a difference and a difference in standards also.Now, your summary is correct from what I am reading. almost out of room so I will post another comment here.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more