Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Forbes+ Yahoo Auto= Bull shit!!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
273 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 30, 2009

I still can't believe this damn list.
X3? X5? X6? are you serious? in Demand?NEVER!

read the article and be disgusted as well:
finance.yahoo.com/family-home/article/108363/most-popular-2010-cars?mod=family-a­utos

Please share your thoughts.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (motormouthtv)

  • I agree with you totally, equating days on lot with 2010 popularity is ridiculous. I also enjoyed the article's comment about the RAV4 having "luxury appointments" like halogen headlights! How many decades has it been since cars have had anything but as standard!

  • Ya i felt like even mentioning the RAV4 was wasted time lol. The article was pretty much a joke.

  • x3 and x6?!?! for x3, most of my guy friends don't even think its a worthy competitor amount its class. for x6, can a car be anymore uglier?!

    Totally agree with you, But for x5, just because it screams "i have money to throw around" it is very popular amount rich ppl...lol

  • LOL. Happy we see eye to eye! Ya the X5 is actually a pretty good car, but it certainly doesnt deserve to be in the top 10 even!

see all

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • totally appreciate this comment. im gonna keep focusing on doing what i do! :)

  • Having said that, I totally don't care about this kind of "scientific" articles. What I do care about is opinions of industry insiders, car enthusiasts, who really know about cars. So my suggestions would be, don't waste your time and energy with such articles, and keep on working on those opinionated, unscientific, great car reviews. :-)

  • Nothing wrong with the article per se. They did not write the article based on what they think or what they feel; what they did is pretty much a scientific study. They provide the sources they get the numbers from, describe the method they used for calculation, and show the results. But I'm sure one could use different sources, different methods, and come up with a totally different list.

  • LOL, nope that wasnt me! happy you agreed on the episode tho!

  • Dude, I think I saw you at a Walgreen's in my neck of the woods 4th and Townsend Street. It was like maybe 4 or 5 days ago. Were you in that part of town, or do you have a twin? LOL Anyway, I agree with what had to say in this video. I call complete bullshit as well.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more