HHO Anatomy of engine

This video shows the anatomy of three engines. They also can prove that engines can run on 3 liters of HHO per minute.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• HHO
• fuel
• cell
• anatomy
• of
• engine
• rotary
• reciprocating
• turbine
• water4fuel
• four
• stroke

[mafiouso]

thake this video off, spastic

[mikeyidh]

Well you learn how to spell I might think about it.

[ed6ontube]

has anyone made their car run on pure hho? what web site has it? is it legal?

why do people say "run your car on water" when they are not running it on water, but running it on gasoline and adding hho to the air intake?

[mikeyidh]

The only thing people are doing in progress with fueling HHO in a vehicle is an extreme amount of fuel efficacy. I believe that a new engine design made for burning halogen will use little or no fossil fuel.

[JustinJJHCS1]

true but it is less then 25% efficient only a small portion if the Fuel is converted into reciprocating motion the rest is lost to heat and friction.

HHO only Up's this to 40% to 50% this is why you get better performance from Propane and HHO the Engine wastes Heat Vaporizing the fuel

A Sterling engine is 70% to 80% efficient because one cylinder is always Hot and one is always cold.

[kyoojona]

@KKahle the physics is simple to me>>>the ignition of gasoline in the cylinders causes the pistons to move down>>>the ignition of hydrogen DOES THE SAME THING>>>but I definitely disagree with upsetting the elephant in the room.

[dext1991]

tell me how does a 1 cylinder then work? if you need 4 cylinders to drive the compression of each other?... o.o uhm do a search on "Stoichiometry" it might help you :) uhm and that sandwich engine, is called a Boxer engine :)

[TK42138]

@Me102288

Good point.

[Me102288]

@TK42138 ? Energy = Mass x the coeffecient of velecity = the energy of a mass moving at a velocity :-o

I Was talking about the actual fact its not based o energy given out in litre's of water. it was a calculation that water is not just energy like gasoline, but reuseable he was comparing the fact one drop of water could potentially put out billions of times more. you cant destroy energy...we burn hydrogen.. it exaust water.. how is that? we burned the hydrogen.. water is h2o.. :-o infinite.

[Me102288]

@jeforton no browns GAS is not h2o in the gas form, only the liquid form. Electrolysis breaks the bond and the 2 are apart hence 2 parts of hydrogen gas and 1 part of oxygen. Its no longer liquid.

Anyway, much like concrete, dirt, stone, and cement = concrete.. but none of them are concrete on there own so to speak.. lol

[TK42138]

@Me102288

I think he meant in relation to his E = mc² formula. If you could convert any substance (water, chocolate, bullsh*t, anything) into energy then yes, you'd get a huge amount of energy since mass and energy are basically the same thing.

[Me102288]

@jeforton yep, I'm running a generator on it, currently supply'ing power for my fridge an emergency lights. HHO is slit from water... H2O is water. Or if you really want to get technical, HHO is a nickname everyone use's instead of 2h1o.

[jeforton]

@Me102288 you do understand what "brown's gas" is right? HHO... H2O. water. water does not burn. the electrolysis splits the hydrogen and oxygen to form H2 and O2. hydrogen and oxygen. HHO, is water.

[aForkandaSpoon]

I am not sure if you do this but if you run an engine on HHO only then you actually should ignite the gas at the bottom of the stroke. When all of the gas turns into a little water it will form a huge vacuum and suck the piston back up, I built some rockets and experience the problem of them collapsing when run on pure HHO.