Why Wing Chun SUCKS
Top Comments
All Comments (5,154)
-
@LCPD9111 Heh. Most of the origin of wing chun has been shown to be crap. Google: "Myth of Wing Chun"
-
just look onto how wing chun was invented
-
@LCPD9111 Evidence of wing chun not sucking "when u need to defend yourself against street thugs".
Provide some evidence.
Please post one (ONE!!) video where wing chun was used to defend someone on the street (and please not just a sucker-punch against a noob).
-
evidence for what?
-
what i meant i that wing chun is not useless when u need to defend yourself and the martial art style i not used for going around and beating people
-
@LCPD9111 How do you fight someone without going on the offence? What, is this a kung fu movie, where you 'block' a few punches, hold your fist an inch from your opponent's face, and then the opponent stares at you in awe and walks away? You can not hope to defend yourself without being able to ATTACK and WIN. I do not see the logic behind your claim.
-
@LCPD9111 Evidence please.
-
but basically isn't wing chun to defend yourself may it be noobs or not? it is for offence not to go around kicking people's ass
-
@LCPD9111 Being effective against noobs does not mean a style is 'good'. I can beat up a four-year-old using a rubber chicken. Doesn't mean rubber-chicken style is good.
-
it doesn't suck for when u need to defend yourself against street thugs
@septic
You can't answer Mac can you? You're afraid of him. The way of the scientist is to welcome being proven wrong because it leads to truth. For a scientist the truth is more important than personal opinion. When Andrew Wiley first presented his proof of Fermat's last theorem he was challenged and realised his error. He turned and thanked the mathematician for pointing it out. He was then able to revise his work and then reach that famous proof.
You could learn much from this.
wingchunisforhomos 1 month ago 8
@wingchunisforhomos I call it, Science-do.
stardust005 1 month ago 7