We've Heard It Already: Rise of the Fallen who then get up again

#6 Dont believe him! Hes lying! He hates Christians and all religious people! 00:01

#7, the person who whines and complains about religious wars is disingenuous. 01:45

#8, Communism had nothing to do with it. They killed people because they were Atheists. 03:05

#9 A secular world would be a world full of sex and violence and anarchy and drugs and so on. 4:50

#10 Judges have no qualifications to rule on the validity of evolution or Creationism 07:54

#11, Mao believed that he was God, but he was motivated by Atheism 08:50

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• Common
• Arguements

[LastOptionPils]

Out of curiosity why is Qui-Gon Jinn under anarchy?

[dechha1981]

Meh, kind of a rebel jedi. makes sense, sort of.

[Responding2ISLAM]

did you make that cool picture yourself at 3:47 or is it something i can google??

[dechha1981]

I put it together myself

[PokemonGoldenOldies]

Wow, 40 WHIA videos already! How time flies.

[dechha1981]

Wow, something I created has its own Initials Netspeak word thing. That means... um... something or other, possibly nothing, I dunno. But it's interesting!

[sulthus]

im a -2 lol

[artemisfair]

oh yeah, I forgot about that bravo de christos guy. Funny stuff.

[ThePissedOffAtheist]

Heretic! Just blame atheists!

[ThePissedOffAtheist]

"Communism had nothing to do with it. They killed people because they were Atheists."

Strange, Christian bigots 50 years ago (aka Nazis) said that all communists were Jews. How times change.

[Juel92]

The reason people died under Mao was because the qouter system. He split the country into small resource providing regions(dunno what they are called) and they had to fill a specific quote of resources such as grain or iron. When the harvest was bad or the iron income low the citizens had to pitch in with their own food and iron and millions of people starved to death. It had NOTHING to do with atheism per se since atheism has no rules or dogmas bound to it.

[technologysucks]

Creationist: It's not fair to make my poor little creationism be judged by the courts

Me: I agree! *Throws his poor little creationism into a metaphorical cage with a panel of scientists and takes cover as the metaphorical carnage splatters the entire room*

[technologysucks]

"Judges have no qualifications to rule on the validity of evolution or creationism"

lol, that one made me laugh out loud, 'cause it's like. "I agree, scientists should do it, but hey, would you really rather it be decided by them?" It's like someone in a collesseum complaining that it's not fair to be pitted against a viciious dog when the alternative battle is an angry grizzly teamed up with a siberian tiger. At least there's a remote CHANCE it could go either way with the dogs/judges

[dechha1981]

Oh I see "The Ends justifies the Means". Who cares how many people died so long as we get to have fun killing people, right?

[Vaara78]

Im an 11 on the Dawkins scale.