Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Child Rape and the Modern State by the Southern Avenger

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
2,368
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 28, 2008

In light of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision that states cannot seek the death penalty for child rapists, SA examines the moral implications of the decision, as well as non-governmental correctives.

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Rapists deserve no mercy just as they showed none

  • Government only cares about preserving itself.

    The indivdual, the people themselves are irrelevant in this globalist agenda.

    Keep on shootin' straight SA!

see all

All Comments (102)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @seltian Once you rape or kill you are no longer a human being, you're scum and you should be dealt with as such.

  • The death penalty is moral hypocrisy. It makes no sense to enforce laws against murder and rape by killing people. The government has no more right to kill people than the murderers do.

    The only problem with the SC decision is that it did not totally ban the death penalty.

  • This film is very interesting. Thank you.

  • Janet Renio got awayt with murder and child abuse at Waco

  • You are exactly right except for one statement.

    "I cannot believe the legal system can charge minors as adults."

    The crime should be the sole determinant of the punishment, not the income level, race, sexual orientation, GPA, or even age of the offender. We are punishing the offender for the offense, that is all. Any mitigation that involves a personal characteristic the person has no control over (height, race, age, birthplace, what have you) should never be applicable.

  • libertarian positions...

    Gay marriage: govt shouldn't be involved in marriage at all

    Abortion: hotly debated topic, libertarians have numerous differing opinions, though most support to some extent

    Drugs: it's no one else's business what chemical reactions a person chooses to have in their brain... other people don't belong to you

    Death penalty: another topic for debate, no consensus, though most oppose

    Child molestation: a criminal act, no different from rape or any other physical assault

  • It's not just a modern phenomenon. The state has always existed as the claimed owner of the people it rules. That's the whole purpose of the state: to own us as livestock and live off our productive efforts. It's an institution created by and for parasites that's had twelve millenia to evolve into the most efficient system of plunder possible. All the "services" it claims to provide and all the propaganda about it serving the people, including elections, are meant to keep us docile and obedient.

  • What you are reading is completely and utterly biased history as taught by Christian historians (affiliated with the church). Are there excesses in Islam - YES! But then so are with Christianity - the British used religion to spread colonialism, looked down on non-christians. The Dutch converted the colonies they occupied into Christians.

    Besides, practicing a different faith is not prohibited converting out of Islam is sometimes punished. Draconian - yes, which is why the US is so great

  • Yep, that is why many Islamic countries punish those who would convert to Christianity or Judaism by death.

    Get your facts straight.

    Why don't you do your homework on the spreading of Islam by the Sword, the sack of Constantinople, the battle at the gates of Vienna, before making claims which you can not support because of your lack of knowledge of Islam and religious history.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more