Icom 746 pro vs 756 pro III

Rx on 80 meters with both 746pro and 756proIII

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• icom
• 746
• pro
• 756
• III
• meters
• hamradio
• amateur
• radio

[spymsn]

Hi, you MFJ audio compressor works fine?

I´m interesting in buy one this

73´s de XE1XNP

[va2oz]

@spymsn Hi, Yes I Love it's a good piece of equipment and will operate any microphone on any radio, well shielded very happy.  Thanks

[marcoilbello]

hello va2oz..i not understand if for your experience is better icom 746 or 756..

thank you ciao from italia

[va2oz]

@marcoilbello Cioa!  Personally I prefer the 756 III -Pro than the 746 pro for HF. I find it much smoother. Thank you for the comment...73'

[ibew1jw]

27.025 in memory???

[va2oz]

@ibew1jw Hi, Sure best propagation indicator ;)  Thanks for the comment.

[ilovenbcnews]

True Id agree with that, but I think the garbage that you would find on 20, is on maybe 2 % of the band, where CB, its most of it. Now the crap you find on 75, as far as the amount is greater, per frequency then 20m, wouldn't you think?

[ILLUDICHRIS]

The needle on the Pro3 needs to be painted day-glo orange

[ILLUDICHRIS]

@ilovenbcnews I don't agree, my Pro3 works great for CB. All the homeboys and mud ducks tell me my AM mauldulation is hammerin' loud!

I'm bleeding all 40 so I must be gettin' out!

[petchharrison]

WELL DSP IS JUST TO COVER SYNTH NOISE FROM THE RADIO,MY VINTAGE RADIO DONT GET THAT SO NO DEE YES PEE FOR ME THEN.

AND I DONT MISS IT ON BIT,TRYED DSP SOUNDED HORRABLE JEFF M6GLH

[AudiophileTubes]

The 756 Pro3 has a sick receiver, however DSP implementation is not the best. The rig often sounds muffled and veiled on CW. Very fatiguing to listen to compared to older, analog type rigs. I've heard many others with the same complaints!