Glenn Beck - Andrew Napolitano defines a right
Top Comments
All Comments (27)
-
HOW IS BEING HEALTHY NOT PART OF "Life, and the pusuit of happiness"?????
AND HOW THE FUCK DOES healthcare NOT part of/ stem from HUMANITY!!!!
-
Aren't rights socially perscribed rather than natural?
-
What a cockroach.
-
Right on Judge! One of the clearest explanations I have ever heard!
-
this might be a serious topic but are well all forgetting the uploaders name is romulan hooker???
-
@13shadowwolf Or maybe you are a fucking moron.... Much more likely... Socialist moronic prick... Better to follow the judge than FDR you stupid prick.
-
@Clyaton The "judge" is a fucking retard. Just like his fucking retarded followers.
-
And why couldn't they change these laws without saying, you have to get insurance or you get a fucking fine???!!!! Let me repeat, the government is FORCING you to give someone your money... They could have made pre-existing conditions a thing of the past and still not FORCED all people into healthcare... Just listen to the Judge, he knows better
-
@Clyaton On no! Shit, everybody has to have health care! Fuck, that means that all those fucks that aren't paying in right now will have to chip in their fair share. Shit, all those "denial-of-service" claims by the insurance companies will have to be covered now because the law actually prevents health insurance companies from picking and choosing who gets coverage.
Fuck it might be like Canada, where when a person gets cancer they don't have to get a mortgage to pay for it.
-
@13shadowwolf "The government is not providing Health Care so much as they are preventing insurance companies from fucking people over." You realize they will make EVERYONE have insurance (very few exceptions such as religious reaons)... To spell this out, insurance companies are now guaranteed massive business, the rest fall under government funds (our money)........................
...................... You are a silly misinformed person
Death to all traitors!!!!!!
margiememargie 2 years ago 9
@theplanetshea I think he is focusing on the "inalienable rights" the Constitution provides, those of which he actually named in the video. There are (as always) interpretations of a persons rights, but in the end, the Constitution nailed it on the head, and health care has nothing to do with someones rights. Never has, never will. It's a service provided, free speech is not. Worship is not, publish freely, assemble freely...the ones you name have nothing to do with what he was talking about.
oddessy20 2 years ago 5