GFIGHT.TV: Matt Hughes on Women's MMA
Top Comments
All Comments (126)
-
@rampagesgrill84 he says he doesn't like to see women get hit. nothing wrong with that. he's a man's man. your a internet shit talking pussy.
-
@EweTubee Free choice is being able to do what you choose to within the legislation of a specific government. By definition. You make the same mistake as Hughes does with deciding what the other gender should or shouldn't do, thus thinking of limiting their freedom of choice based on opinion. A opinion which you base on physical limitations, when women are, in fact, fighting women and not men. So it's a even playing field.
-
@rampagesgrill84 That is NOT what i said at all! I never said they shouldn't be provided with free choice, you're just putting words in my mouth because you're choosing to be ignorant, my point is that Matt was correct in saying that women should be allowed to fight in wars, but i CAN empathize with Matt when he says that he disagrees with women fighting, i mean they are a lot weaker than men physically and the majority of them are more sensitive than men, there's no need to be a smart ass man.
-
@EweTubee So according to you women should be able to fight for humanitarian reasons, which goal is to provide free choice for the community and the individual, but then be restricted of the fruit of those choices themselves? Do you see how illogical this sounds?
-
@rampagesgrill84 I'm not debating the merit of the war, what i'm saying is that women and men should both be allowed to fight for their cause, and when it comes to the military your cause is to defend your nation, and believe it or not if the US wasn't in the Middle East doing what it's doing there'd be a lot of extremists out there feeling pretty comfortable doing whatever they felt like without fear of retribution by the US. Regardless, there's a difference between military and sports.
-
@iattackenemy My response for "EweTubee" fits your response as well.
-
@EweTubee The difference is choice. War is done ONLY for political reasons, you're naive if you believe America protects the world for a noble cause. They start it, people follow, it's a free recruiting system. However, there's a difference in free choices as an individual. You're free to choose your path regardless of gender, women can learn techniques as well, they're not another species. This is where Country boy makes a logical fallacy. He sets limitations for choices based on his opinion.
-
@rampagesgrill84 women don't go into combat.... there is a risk that they would get captured and then.... well u know what men sometimes do to women....
-
in america its very wrong 2 express ur honest opinions.u must be the typical liberal otherwise ur a bad person.if u say u dont agree with gay marriage they will paint u out 2 be a villain but someone can say the exact opposite and get cheers. this is the same thing
-
@rampagesgrill84 there's a fine difference between defending your country for a cause and going in there and belting each other for sports, don't be so thick and use your head.
And for the record that country boy is 10000 times more successful than you and he's a good person, so cram it loser.
matt hughes, good man
lucirz 3 years ago 17
So he approves of women shooting and killing in the war, but doesn't approve them doing a full-contact combat sport with rules...
That's some country boy logic for ya!
rampagesgrill84 2 years ago 14