Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

1972 USA vs. USSR Part 6 (Final) Olympic basketball Final

Final. Classic 1972 USA vs. USSR Basketball game  
 
Customize

More From: WiltatKansas

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
24 ratings
Sign in to rate
7,943 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (75)   Options

Loading...
beaverpitt (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
hey doug, the us was the ONLY country that voted NO to using professional players in the olympics. I don't know why, but I do know that interesting fact.
godsmith3 (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
3 countries that voted on the appeal were communist. Wonder why the USSR won the appeal?
TheMidna (5 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@littlebeartoe LOL nice trolling
WTOknife (6 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
wojohugo, this is Jason W.
wojohugo (6 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I never understood why USSR inbounded the ball TWICE under their basket. After Doug's FTs, the USSR coach called a TO, explaining why USSR inbounded (clock showed 1 second.) They put 3 seconds on the clock, and after the TO, USSR threw the ball in, and they missed their shot as the buzzer sounded (thus the USA celebration.)
My comments/questions:
1- Is it true that USSR had zero timeouts left, so they couldn't call one?
2- Why were they given the ball AGAIN?
3- USSR stepped on the line
WTOknife (6 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
yeah they werent supposed t oge tthe ball back so many times. It is some really idiotic ref. I would like to beat up that ref. Us. deserves the medal so much. God**** ref. F****** ref!
beaverpitt (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
OK, a reply- I don't have a 1972 IBO rule book, but I can answer a few things

1. They had a TO, but in international play, a TO could only be called at a dead ball time. Because everyone spoke different languages and ONLY the head coach could call a TO, he was given a button that was connected to the scorers table that would signal a TO. The CCCP coach claimed it wasn't working and banged on the table having the table manually sounding the horn when Doug Collins recieved the ball for ... cont
beaverpitt (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
the 2nd FT. Now, watch the video. The administering ref, The new Trail, waved continue play. The new lead, the ref closest to the table, actually stopped the play, probably becase of pressure from Dr. Jones, head of FIBA, who was sitting right, directly there. He probably felt pressured to see what the trouble was, rather than having a burnt out light bulb cost his team a shot at a gold medal. The ref committed an illegal act, but you can see him looking towards the table before his whistle
beaverpitt (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Answer to NUmber 2. The russians were incorrectly administered the 2nd chance, but not based on the rule book. They treated the whistle as an inadvertant whistle, and allowed cccp to reinbound the ball. The whistle though, was in front of the russian bench and 1 second should have been put on the clock. Instead, they illegally went by the horn when the ball was in Doug Collin's hand and put the ball on the endline with 3 seconds. If they went by this, they should have reshot the FT at 3 sec.
beaverpitt (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Number 3--- I don't have a 1972 IBO or FIBA rule book, but I know in American basketball, the lines are considered out of bounds. If someone touches the line with their feet, they are out of bounds. For a thrower to be considered inbounds, and to violate, he has to step OVER the line or actually break the plane of the line. For there to be a violation, the thrower would have had to step over the line, to inbounds territory because the lines and the disposer are already our of bounds.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.