Lunarcy: Are NASA's artists idiots?
Loading...
Uploaded by un4g1v3n1 on Apr 10, 2008
NASA's own artistic renditions of what it would be like on the moon even have stars in them. WTF happened! And let's not go into the missing exhaust plume business. Panners will tell you it was magical, invisible fuel, that emit's no visible exhaust. Oooh, so now NASA is magical!
Link to this comment:
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (53)
-
I suppose you think those images from the LRO are drivel as well.
-
@un4g1v3n1 Obviously your more intelligent than those scientists who accept understand and never questioned that "drivel" that landed men on the moon.
-
@arobekie It's more convincing than the drivel NASA tried to convince everyone as authentic...That's for damn sure!
-
@un4g1v3n1 Would that be space reality on a canvas,LOL.
-
@arobekie Be a NASA stool....er...stooge all you wish....As for me, I prefer space reality, instead of NASA's fairy tales you hold to like a child to it's pacifer!
-
@un4g1v3n1 Is it a full moon or has your medication worn off? Its took you three weeks to retort with a silly comment,you know youve been busted by my comments,especially the ones about what should be in light and shadow,why dont you just withdraw the video and admit that your silly atempt to debunk a moon landing with illustrations is futile,i think school children could do a better than you without resorting to using drawings.
-
@arobekie "If i asked a class of school kids to draw a rocket landing on the moon,they would all draw flames coming out of the engines"
What arobekie is saying here is that a class of school kids is smarter than he is, and more insightful about what a rocket would look like landing on the moon!
Makes sense to me, after seeing the stupid comments he posted here!
-
@un4g1v3n1 Looks like your lost for words,is to do with me watching your video again or the illustrators discrepancy concerning what should be in light and dark.
-
@arobekie Wow.....You watched it again. I thought you guys just trolled them. You actually watched...Wow, I am amazed.
9:13Lunarcy: A Realistic Look at the LEMby un4g1v3n119,713 views
- 0:41SPED UP - Six clips of objects thrown on the Moonby bertlapollo38,033 views
- 10:50MoonFaker: All Bets Are On, Part 1by PepsiAddict184,247 views
- 6:28Lunarcy: NASA's Radiation Problem IIby un4g1v3n14,028 views
- 9:12pictures from the moon:apollo 11,12,14,15,16 & 17by ggv855,186 views
- 7:58The Truth - Why Nasa Has Never Returned To The ...by 2012Returns857,410 views
- 0:30Apollo 17: the hidden code in the video clipby philboy097157,951 views
- 2:32launch of STS-109, space shuttle columbiaby kwakhed2382,745 views
- 0:13MOON STRANGE PLUME????by micheldezanger3,786 views
- 2:53APOLLO 11: PROOF OF MOON LANDINGby DarkDerby195,186 views
- 1:50No stars visible on Moon?by trodas11,282 views
- 1:07Amazing New pictures of Mars.by countesscristo274,783 views
- 0:05We didnt land on the moon = Proof!by conspiracydude90210394,261 views
- 1:39Mystery force baffles NASAby lovuian3,114,000 views
- 0:03Spider on the Fake Moon Proof of Spoof Hoax Lan...by acharlesc184,432 views
- 1:56Lunarcy: Apollo 11 press conferenceby un4g1v3n19,060 views
- 2:34moon landing HARE and RODENT proof hoaxed?????by acharlesc126,833 views
- 10:49Lunarcy: NASA's Radiation Problemby un4g1v3n110,943 views
- 6:23Lunarcy: Radiation the show stopperby un4g1v3n12,276 views
- 3:01Lunarcy: NASA's Radiation Problem 2.5 4 Dummiesby un4g1v3n11,639 views
Just looking at your video again,if you are using illustrations to debunk a moon landing then they can also be used to prove a moon landing,shouldnt those astronauts and a portion of the LEM at 0:53 be in total darkness,it is just like the photos the CTs rip apart concerning what parts should be light and dark,just thought i would mention it.
arobekie 4 months ago 5
@un4g1v3n1 Are your insults of fairy tales and ability of not being able to handle reality intended to make me change my mind and agree with you on something that you and all other CTs cant prove,like i said,you need to provide concrete evidence of your claims,as for the radiation,van allen admitted that he got it wrong.The russians built lunar landers,they knew you could put a man on the moon,but the CTs reply with,the russians were in on the scam.
arobekie 4 months ago